Adolescent Cannabis Use and Adult Psychoticism: A Longitudinal Co-Twin Control Analysis Using Data From Two Cohorts

Jonathan D. Schaefer, Seon Kyeong Jang, Scott Vrieze, William G. Iacono, Matt McGue, Sylia Wilson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Observational studies have repeatedly linked cannabis use and increased risk of psychosis. We sought to clarify whether this association reflects a causal effect of cannabis exposure or residual confounding. We analyzed data from two cohorts of twins who completed repeated, prospective measures of cannabis use (N = 1544) and cannabis use disorder symptoms (N = 1458) in adolescence and a dimensional measure of psychosis-proneness (the Personality Inventory for DSM–5 Psychoticism scale) in adulthood. Twins also provided molecular genetic data, which were used to estimate polygenic risk of schizophrenia. Both cumulative adolescent cannabis use and use disorder were associated with higher Psychoticism scores in adulthood. However, we found no evidence of an effect of cannabis on Psychoticism or any of its facets in co-twin control models that compared the greatercannabisusing twin to the lesser-using co-twin. We also observed no evidence of a differential effect of cannabis on Psychoticism by polygenic risk of schizophrenia. Although cannabis use and disorder are consistently associated with increased risk of psychosis, the present results suggest this association is likely attributable to familial confounds rather than a causal effect of cannabis exposure.Efforts

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)691-701
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of abnormal psychology
Volume130
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American Psychological Association

Keywords

  • adolescence
  • cannabis
  • marijuana
  • psychosis
  • twin

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Adolescent Cannabis Use and Adult Psychoticism: A Longitudinal Co-Twin Control Analysis Using Data From Two Cohorts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this