Best (but often forgotten) Statistical Practices: Measuring Real-World Intervention Effectiveness using Electronic Health Data

Julian Wolfson, Ashwini Venkatasubramaniam

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

The evidence base supporting the use of most interventions consists primarily of data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), but how and to whom interventions are delivered in clinical practice may differ substantially from these foundational RCTs. With the increasing availability of electronic health data, it is now feasible to study the “real-world” effectiveness of a wide range of interventions. However, real-world intervention effectiveness studies using electronic health data face many challenges including data quality, selection bias, confounding by indication, and lack of generalizability. In this article, we describe the key barriers to generating high-quality evidence from real-world intervention effectiveness studies and suggest statistical best practices for addressing them.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)13-22
Number of pages10
JournalAmerican Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Volume118
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 American Society for Nutrition

Keywords

  • causal inference
  • electronic health records
  • generalizability
  • intervention effectiveness
  • real-world evidence
  • statistical best practices

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Best (but often forgotten) Statistical Practices: Measuring Real-World Intervention Effectiveness using Electronic Health Data'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this