Community benefits from managed resource areas an analysis of construct validity

Jordan W. Smith; Dorothy H. Anderson; Mae A. Davenport; Jessica E. Leahy

doi:10.18666/jlr-2013-v45-i2-3011

Community benefits from managed resource areas an analysis of construct validity

Jordan W. Smith, Dorothy H. Anderson, Mae A. Davenport, Jessica E. Leahy

Forest Resources

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

This research develops a theoretically informed measurement instrument for assessing local community members' perceptions of benefits that managed resource areas provide to their communities. We suggest five distinct types of community benefits dominate individuals' perceptions. These community benefits are ecological, economic, quality of life, physical and aesthetic, and social solidarity. We empirically tested the community benefits measurement instrument for construct validity with data collected from five samples of residents living adjacent to four managed resource areas.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	192-213
Number of pages	22
Journal	Journal of Leisure Research
Volume	45
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.18666/jlr-2013-v45-i2-3011
State	Published - 2013

Keywords

Community benefits
Desired management outcomes
Outcomes-focused management
Scale development

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access

10.18666/jlr-2013-v45-i2-3011

OpenUrl availability

Full text

Cite this

@article{00e6bc608d034db2aaf7a425e5d2f2cb,

title = "Community benefits from managed resource areas an analysis of construct validity",

abstract = "This research develops a theoretically informed measurement instrument for assessing local community members' perceptions of benefits that managed resource areas provide to their communities. We suggest five distinct types of community benefits dominate individuals' perceptions. These community benefits are ecological, economic, quality of life, physical and aesthetic, and social solidarity. We empirically tested the community benefits measurement instrument for construct validity with data collected from five samples of residents living adjacent to four managed resource areas.",

keywords = "Community benefits, Desired management outcomes, Outcomes-focused management, Scale development",

author = "Smith, {Jordan W.} and Anderson, {Dorothy H.} and Davenport, {Mae A.} and Leahy, {Jessica E.}",

year = "2013",

doi = "10.18666/jlr-2013-v45-i2-3011",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "45",

pages = "192--213",

journal = "Journal of Leisure Research",

issn = "0022-2216",

publisher = "National Recreation and Park Association",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Community benefits from managed resource areas an analysis of construct validity

AU - Smith, Jordan W.

AU - Anderson, Dorothy H.

AU - Davenport, Mae A.

AU - Leahy, Jessica E.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - This research develops a theoretically informed measurement instrument for assessing local community members' perceptions of benefits that managed resource areas provide to their communities. We suggest five distinct types of community benefits dominate individuals' perceptions. These community benefits are ecological, economic, quality of life, physical and aesthetic, and social solidarity. We empirically tested the community benefits measurement instrument for construct validity with data collected from five samples of residents living adjacent to four managed resource areas.

AB - This research develops a theoretically informed measurement instrument for assessing local community members' perceptions of benefits that managed resource areas provide to their communities. We suggest five distinct types of community benefits dominate individuals' perceptions. These community benefits are ecological, economic, quality of life, physical and aesthetic, and social solidarity. We empirically tested the community benefits measurement instrument for construct validity with data collected from five samples of residents living adjacent to four managed resource areas.

KW - Community benefits

KW - Desired management outcomes

KW - Outcomes-focused management

KW - Scale development

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875938338&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875938338&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.18666/jlr-2013-v45-i2-3011

DO - 10.18666/jlr-2013-v45-i2-3011

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84875938338

SN - 0022-2216

VL - 45

SP - 192

EP - 213

JO - Journal of Leisure Research

JF - Journal of Leisure Research

IS - 2

ER -

Community benefits from managed resource areas an analysis of construct validity

Abstract

Keywords

UN SDGs

Access

OpenUrl availability

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this