Comparative species assessments of five-needle pines throughout the western United States

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

Five-needle white pine species provide important ecosystem services throughout the western U.S., and many of these species have become susceptible to stressors including warmer temperatures, insect epidemics, nonnative disease, and altered disturbance regimes. The objective of this study was to characterize recent broad-scale demographic patterns, including species abundance (i.e., numbers of individuals, tree density, size-class distributions, recruitment, growth rates, mortality rates, and causes of mortality, for the six species of five-needle pine that occur in the western US. We used the U.S. Forest Service's Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) dataset, spanning greater than 10 years, to quantify demographic status and trends for each species. FIA data were compiled from a probabilistic sample design and consistent analysis framework that included not only the dominant community types of five-needle pines, but also all other forest community types, which have previously been demonstrated to encompass abundant regeneration of five-needle pine species. Our analysis revealed similar trends for whitebark and limber pines: both species exhibited increased levels of mortality that are occurring faster than growth of surviving trees, as well as abundant regeneration in forest types that are not dominated by five-needle pines. Although limber pine has experienced lower mortality rates than whitebark pine, it nonetheless showed signs of decline that are comparable to broad-scale indicators exhibited by whitebark pine 10 years prior. In contrast to whitebark and limber pines, Great Basin bristlecone and foxtail pine mortality rates were relatively low, and their populations exhibited a flat diameter distribution except for restricted recruitment from seedling to sapling size-classes. Our findings suggest that five-needle white pine species would benefit not only from increased seedling recruitment, but also from enhanced recruitment among older and larger age and size classes. Thus, it may be important to apply a variety of management strategies – including artificial regeneration with disease-resistant seedlings, direct seeding, and early intervention to decrease competition that may allow natural regeneration to achieve recruitment inter large size-classes – and also apply silviculture techniques to forest types that may be dominated by other species. The consistent monitoring conducted by FIA can allow future assessment of the demographic trajectory of each five-needle pine species, and thus can help prioritize management and restoration priorities, both within communities dominated by five-needle pines and in other community types that may be important targets for silvicultural interventions or restoration treatments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number119438
JournalForest Ecology and Management
Volume496
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 15 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
We respectfully offer gratitude to the many land stewards who granted permission for FIA field crews to visit plot locations and collect the data analyzed in this paper. We are also grateful to the field crews themselves, and to FIA’s database teams, for their diligent work. This work was supported in part by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, and by the Minnesota Agriculture Experimentation Station (Project MIN-42-100). The findings and conclusions in this publication are those of the authors and should not be construed to represent any official USDA or U.S. Government determination or policy.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021

Keywords

  • Forest inventory
  • Foxtail
  • Great Basin bristlecone
  • Limber
  • Pinus albicaulis
  • Pinus aristata
  • Pinus balfouriana
  • Pinus flexilis
  • Pinus longaeva
  • Pinus strobiformis
  • Rocky Mountain bristlecone pine
  • Southwestern white
  • Whitebark

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative species assessments of five-needle pines throughout the western United States'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this