COMPARING STUDENTS TO WORKERS: THE EFFECTS OF SOCIAL FRAMING ON BEHAVIOR IN DISTRIBUTION GAMES

Jeffrey P. Carpenter, Stephen Burks, Eric Verhoogen

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

66 Scopus citations

Abstract

To investigate the external validity of Ultimatum and Dictator game behavior we conduct experiments in field settings with naturally occurring variation in "social framing." Our participants are students at Middlebury College, non-traditional students at Kansas City Kansas Community College (KCKCC), and employees at a Kansas City distribution center. Ultimatum game offers are ordered: KCKCC > employee > Middlebury. In the Dictator game employees are more generous than students in either location. Workers behaved distinctly from both student groups in that their allocations do not decrease between games, an effect we attribute to the social framing of the workplace.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationField Experiments in Economics
EditorsG.W. Harrison, Jeffrey Carpenter, John List
Pages261-289
Number of pages29
DOIs
StatePublished - 2004
Externally publishedYes

Publication series

NameResearch in Experimental Economics
Volume10
ISSN (Print)0193-2306

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
We thank Julia Assael, Gary Carpenter, Pamela Carpenter, and Marla Weinstein for research assistance, Laura Burks for help with the data, Mary Grunke and Cathy Plaster for facilitating our experiments at KCKCC, three referees for their thoughtful comments, and the MacArthur Foundation’s norms and preferences working group for generous financial support. In addition Carpenter acknowledges the National Science Foundation (SES-CAREER 0092953) and Verhoogen acknowledges the MacArthur Foundation’s cost of inequality network.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'COMPARING STUDENTS TO WORKERS: THE EFFECTS OF SOCIAL FRAMING ON BEHAVIOR IN DISTRIBUTION GAMES'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this