Comparison of molecular and cytogenetic methods in the evaluation of engraftment following allogeneic bone marrow transplantation

Cytogenetic evaluation of patients after bone marrow transplantation (BMT) has provided a standard method of documentation of hematopoietic engraftment. More recently, recombinant DNA technology has also been applied to determine engraftment status. In order to establish the relative utility of these methods in clinical practice we have directly compared the data from cytogenetic and recombinant DNA methods, evaluating engraftment status in 68 BMT recipients. Patients were evaluated pre-transplant, 30, 60, 90, and 180 days after BMT, and yearly thereafter for 1) the presence or absence of the Y chromosome in sex-mismatched allogeneic transplant recipients, 2) the presence or absence of the Philadelphia chromosome [t(9;22)] in patients transplanted for chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), 3) restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) profiles, and/or 4) clonal rearrangement of the bcr gene. Cytogenetic examination of unstimulated bone marrow and recombinant DNA tests of nucleated peripheral blood or bone marrow cells produce qualitatively similar data in the identification of patient and donor cells and/or normal and tumor cells. Differences in the results obtained by the two analytic methods were most often due to the restricted cell populations evaluable by cytogenetic studies of PHA-stimulated peripheral blood specimens. DNA analyses could frequently be applied at earlier intervals after transplantation and, in cases of graft rejection, when cell counts were low. Although recombinant DNA methods required fewer cells and demonstrated greater sensitivity in detection of minor cell populations in the majority of instances, the cytogenetic evaluation may complement the DNA studies and allow detection of additional chromosomal anomalies.