Constructing the brief diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (bDC/TMD) for field testing

Justin Durham, Richard Ohrbach, Lene Baad-Hansen, Stephen Davies, Antoon De Laat, Daniela Godoi Goncalves, Valeria V. Gordan, Jean Paul Goulet, Birgitta Häggman-Henrikson, Michael Horton, Michail Koutris, Alan Law, Thomas List, Frank Lobbezoo, Ambra Michelotti, Donald R. Nixdorf, Juan Fernando Oyarzo, Chris Peck, Chris Penlington, Karen G. RaphaelVivian Santiago, Sonia Sharma, Peter Svensson, Corine M. Visscher, Imamura Yoshiki, Per Alstergren

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Despite advances in temporomandibular disorders' (TMDs) diagnosis, the diagnostic process continues to be problematic in non-specialist settings. Objective: To complete a Delphi process to shorten the Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (DC/TMD) to a brief DC/TMD (bDC/TMD) for expedient clinical diagnosis and initial management. Methods: An international Delphi panel was created with 23 clinicians representing major specialities, general dentistry and related fields. The process comprised a full day workshop, seven virtual meetings, six rounds of electronic discussion and finally an open consultation at a virtual international symposium. Results: Within the physical axis (Axis 1), the self-report Symptom Questionnaire of the DC/TMD did not require shortening from 14 items for the bDC/TMD. The compulsory use of the TMD pain screener was removed reducing the total number of Axis 1 items by 18%. The DC/TMD Axis 1 10-section examination protocol (25 movements, up to 12 sets of bilateral palpations) was reduced to four sections in the bDC/TMD protocol involving three movements and three sets of palpations. Axis I then resulted in two groups of diagnoses: painful TMD (inclusive of secondary headache), and common joint-related TMD with functional implications. The psychosocial axis (Axis 2) was shortened to an ultra-brief 11 item assessment. Conclusion: The bDC/TMD represents a substantially reduced and likely expedited method to establish (grouping) diagnoses in TMDs. This may provide greater utility for settings requiring less granular diagnoses for the implementation of initial treatment, for example non-specialist general dental practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)785-794
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Oral Rehabilitation
Volume51
Issue number5
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords

  • facial pain
  • temporomandibular disorders
  • temporomandibular joint
  • temporomandibular joint disorders
  • temporomandibular joint dysfunction syndrome

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Constructing the brief diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (bDC/TMD) for field testing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this