Critical Perturbations for Second Order Elliptic Operators—Part II: Non-tangential Maximal Function Estimates

Simon Bortz, Steve Hofmann, José Luis Luna Garcia, Svitlana Mayboroda, Bruno Poggi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This is the final part of a series of papers where we study perturbations of divergence form second order elliptic operators -divA∇ by first and zero order terms, whose complex coefficients lie in critical spaces, via the method of layer potentials. In particular, we show that the L2 well-posedness (with natural non-tangential maximal function estimates) of the Dirichlet, Neumann and regularity problems for complex Hermitian, block form, or constant-coefficient divergence form elliptic operators in the upper half-space are all stable under such perturbations. Due to the lack of the classical De Giorgi–Nash–Moser theory in our setting, our method to prove the non-tangential maximal function estimates relies on a completely new argument: We obtain a certain weak-Lp “N<S” estimate, which we eventually couple with square function bounds, weighted extrapolation theory, and a bootstrapping argument to recover the full L2 bound. Finally, we show the existence and uniqueness of solutions in a relatively broad class. As a corollary, we claim the first results in an unbounded domain concerning the Lp-solvability of boundary value problems for the magnetic Schrödinger operator -(∇-ia)2+V when the magnetic potential a and the electric potential V are accordingly small in the norm of a scale-invariant Lebesgue space.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number31
JournalArchive For Rational Mechanics And Analysis
Volume248
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE, part of Springer Nature 2024.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Critical Perturbations for Second Order Elliptic Operators—Part II: Non-tangential Maximal Function Estimates'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this