Deceased Organ Donors and PHS Risk Identification: Impact on Organ Usage and Outcomes

Timothy L. Pruett, Marissa A. Clark, Sarah E. Taranto

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

46 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background In 2013, the public health service (PHS) changed the criteria intended to identify organ donors that put the associated organ recipients at increased risk for acquiring human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV). The changing donor demographics, organ utilization, and outcomes associated with this change are not known. Methods A review of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database was performed to assess the impact of PHS donor designation on organ utilization and outcomes. Results After the 2013 modification, over 20% of all deceased organ donors in the United States were identified as PHS increased risk. Compared with the standard risk deceased organ donor, the PHS donor was younger, male, died from anoxia, more likely to be HCV and antibody reacting to hepatitis B core antigen+, and less likely to have diabetes or hypertension. Organs from the 18- to 34-year-old deceased donors with PHS risks (but relatively few medical comorbidities) and tested negative for HCV were less frequently transplanted compared with the standard risk donors (3.9 vs 4.2 organs transplanted per donor). However, the transplant patient and graft survival as well as risk of unexpected transmission of HIV, HBV, and HCV were equivalent, irrespective of PHS donor status. Conclusions The rationale of using PHS donor designation that negatively impacts utilization of high-quality organs without the benefit of identifying the subset of organs with demonstrable proclivity to transmit HIV, HBV, or HCV needs to be reexamined.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1670-1678
Number of pages9
JournalTransplantation
Volume101
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Deceased Organ Donors and PHS Risk Identification: Impact on Organ Usage and Outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this