Abstract
The design of N95 filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) continues to pose usability concerns for healthcare workers, which have been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this study was to develop a holistic model to guide mask design improvement. Dental students (n = 38) with experience wearing N95 FFRs participated in a randomized wear trial of three alternative protective masks. A mixed methods survey was used to examine usability of individual mask design components, the relationship of facial/head area to mask features, and overall mask design. Survey results indicated MNmask v1 demonstrated higher usability in seal confidence (M = 3.46), while MNmask v2 performed higher in satisfactory fit (M = 3.50). Design components of nose wire and head/neck bands were the most problematic, while conditions of skin irritation and tight/loose fit created an unfavorable wear experience. To consider healthcare workers’ needs in improving the usability of protective masks, a model is presented to consider characteristics of fit, comfort, material, and design.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Article number | 103751 |
Journal | Applied Ergonomics |
Volume | 102 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jul 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2022
Keywords
- COVID-19
- Healthcare workers
- Holistic mask design approach
- Mask design improvement
- N95 filtering facepiece respirators
- Remote usability
PubMed: MeSH publication types
- Journal Article
- Randomized Controlled Trial