Design considerations for protective mask development: A remote mask usability evaluation

Alison Cloet, Linsey Griffin, Minji Yu, William Durfee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

The design of N95 filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) continues to pose usability concerns for healthcare workers, which have been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this study was to develop a holistic model to guide mask design improvement. Dental students (n = 38) with experience wearing N95 FFRs participated in a randomized wear trial of three alternative protective masks. A mixed methods survey was used to examine usability of individual mask design components, the relationship of facial/head area to mask features, and overall mask design. Survey results indicated MNmask v1 demonstrated higher usability in seal confidence (M = 3.46), while MNmask v2 performed higher in satisfactory fit (M = 3.50). Design components of nose wire and head/neck bands were the most problematic, while conditions of skin irritation and tight/loose fit created an unfavorable wear experience. To consider healthcare workers’ needs in improving the usability of protective masks, a model is presented to consider characteristics of fit, comfort, material, and design.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number103751
JournalApplied Ergonomics
Volume102
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022

Keywords

  • COVID-19
  • Healthcare workers
  • Holistic mask design approach
  • Mask design improvement
  • N95 filtering facepiece respirators
  • Remote usability

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Design considerations for protective mask development: A remote mask usability evaluation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this