Effect of an additional bonding resin on the 5-year performance of a universal adhesive: a randomized clinical trial

M. Victoria Fuentes, Jorge Perdigão, Bruno Baracco, Isabel Giráldez, Laura Ceballos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the effect of the application of an additional hydrophobic bonding resin on the clinical performance of a universal adhesive applied in etch-and-rinse (ER) or self-etch adhesive (SE) strategy in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) after 5 years. Materials and methods: Scotchbond Universal Adhesive (3M Oral Care) was applied in 134 NCCLs of 39 subjects using different adhesion approaches: 3-step ER (3-ER), 2-step ER (2-ER), 2-step SE (2-SE), and 1-step SE (1-SE). Enamel and dentin were acid etched prior to application of the universal adhesive for the 3-ER and 2-ER groups. An extra layer of a hydrophobic bonding resin was applied for groups 3-ER and 2-SE. All lesions were restored with Filtek Supreme XTE resin composite (3M Oral Care). Restorations were evaluated at baseline and at 5 years using the modified USPHS criteria. Mann–Whitney U and Wilcoxon tests were performed, and the survival rates (retention/fracture) were analyzed using Kaplan–Meier and log-rank tests (p < 0.05). Results: The recall rate was 66.7% at 5 years. The cumulative survival rate was 96.9% for 3-ER, 96.8% for 2-ER, 71.4% for 2-SE, and 81.3% for 1-SE strategies. The log-rank test was statistically significant (p = 0.006). Retention rates were 100% for both ER groups, 75% for 2-SE and 81.3% for 1-SE. At 5 years, 2- and 1-SE approaches showed similar retention rates, but lower than those for 3- and 2-ER. A significant decrease in retention rate was detected for 2-SE (p = 0.007) and 1-SE (p = 0.014) groups between baseline and 5 years. All groups, except 2-ER, showed an increase in marginal discoloration. For this parameter, significant differences were detected between 2-ER and 1-SE (p = 0.004). Conclusions: The addition of a hydrophobic bonding resin to the recommended application sequence of Scotchbond Universal Adhesive did not improve its clinical performance in NCCLs after 5 years. Higher retention rates were measured when this adhesive was applied in ER mode. Trial registration: This manuscript is a 5-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial that started in 2012 when there was no strong recommendation for registration in clinicaltrials.gov. The results after 36 months of clinical service were previously published in this journal.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)837-848
Number of pages12
JournalClinical oral investigations
Volume27
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Keywords

  • Adhesion strategy
  • Extra bonding layer
  • Non-carious cervical lesions
  • Randomized clinical trial
  • Universal adhesive

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Journal Article

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of an additional bonding resin on the 5-year performance of a universal adhesive: a randomized clinical trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this