TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of feed withdrawal prior to slaughter on prevalence of gastric ulcers in pigs
AU - Eisemann, Joan H.
AU - Morrow, W. E.Morgan
AU - See, M. Todd
AU - Davies, Peter R.
AU - Zering, Kelly
PY - 2002/2/15
Y1 - 2002/2/15
N2 - Objective - To determine whether withdrawing feed from pigs prior to slaughter had any effects on prevalence or severity of gastric ulcers. Design - Split-plot design. Animals - 873 pigs. Procedures - At the finishing barn, pigs were assigned to 30 pens. Feed withdrawal times (0, 12, or 24 hours) were assigned to pens at random, and pigs in each pen were marketed in 3 groups over a period of 4 weeks. The first marketing group consisted of the 10 heaviest pigs in each pen, the second consisted of the next 10 heaviest, and the third consisted of all remaining pigs. Feed was withheld from all pigs in each pen prior to removal of each marketing group. Thus, feed was withheld once, twice, or 3 times for pigs in the first, second, and third marketing groups, respectively. Results - Feed withdrawal time was not significantly associated with ulcer score at the time of slaughter. Ulcer scores and prevalence of chronic damage were higher in the third marketing group, regardless of feed withdrawal time. Prevalence of severe damage, prevalence of chronic damage, and prevalence of esophageal constriction increased as carcass weight decreased. No pigs died of gastric ulceration. Conclusion and Clinical Relevance - Results suggest that withdrawal of feed from pigs prior to slaughter does not increase damage to the stomach and that repeated feed withdrawal does not result in fatal gastric ulceration.
AB - Objective - To determine whether withdrawing feed from pigs prior to slaughter had any effects on prevalence or severity of gastric ulcers. Design - Split-plot design. Animals - 873 pigs. Procedures - At the finishing barn, pigs were assigned to 30 pens. Feed withdrawal times (0, 12, or 24 hours) were assigned to pens at random, and pigs in each pen were marketed in 3 groups over a period of 4 weeks. The first marketing group consisted of the 10 heaviest pigs in each pen, the second consisted of the next 10 heaviest, and the third consisted of all remaining pigs. Feed was withheld from all pigs in each pen prior to removal of each marketing group. Thus, feed was withheld once, twice, or 3 times for pigs in the first, second, and third marketing groups, respectively. Results - Feed withdrawal time was not significantly associated with ulcer score at the time of slaughter. Ulcer scores and prevalence of chronic damage were higher in the third marketing group, regardless of feed withdrawal time. Prevalence of severe damage, prevalence of chronic damage, and prevalence of esophageal constriction increased as carcass weight decreased. No pigs died of gastric ulceration. Conclusion and Clinical Relevance - Results suggest that withdrawal of feed from pigs prior to slaughter does not increase damage to the stomach and that repeated feed withdrawal does not result in fatal gastric ulceration.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037085335&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037085335&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2460/javma.2002.220.503
DO - 10.2460/javma.2002.220.503
M3 - Article
C2 - 11862983
AN - SCOPUS:0037085335
SN - 0003-1488
VL - 220
SP - 503
EP - 506
JO - Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
JF - Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
IS - 4
ER -