End Users' Perceived Engagement with Clinical Dashboards: A Rapid Review

Grace Gao, Christie L. Martin, Camille Vaughan, Alayne Markland, Ursula Kelly, Neha Pathak, Joseph Wallace, Zachary Burningham

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Clinical dashboards are an emerging and fast-evolving technology used to support frontline clinicians' practice. Understanding end users' perceived engagement with clinical dashboards is essential to co-design, implementation, and adoption. There is a lack of literature exploring the integration of dashboards into clinical workflow. This rapid review explores clinical end users' perceived engagement with dashboards that support workflow. We conducted a literature search in PubMed and CINAHL. Four articles met our eligibility criteria. Findings reveal variations in taxonomy and measures used to evaluate clinicians' perceived engagement. There are also a variety of reported barriers and facilitators to adoption. Standardized frameworks and vocabulary are needed to facilitate a common understanding of clinical end users' perceived engagement with dashboards.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1091-1095
Number of pages5
JournalStudies in health technology and informatics
Volume310
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 25 2024

Keywords

  • Dashboards
  • evaluation
  • perceived engagement
  • usability
  • workflow

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Review
  • Journal Article

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'End Users' Perceived Engagement with Clinical Dashboards: A Rapid Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this