TY - JOUR
T1 - Epidural analgesia superior to patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain relief in gynecologic oncology surgery
AU - Simon, Deborah A.
AU - Connor, Joseph P.
AU - Kushner, David M.
AU - Evans, Michael D.
AU - Hartenbach, Ellen M.
PY - 2007/7
Y1 - 2007/7
N2 - OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of epidural versus patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) for postoperative pain management in patients undergoing laparotomies for gynecologic cancer. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 172 patients (86 in each group) undergoing laparotomy from May 2004 to August 2005 was identified. Information from medical records was abstracted, including patient characteristics, cancer type, surgical procedure, postoperative complications, pain scores, day tolerating general diet, and discharge day. Groups were compared using the χ test for association and Wilcoxon rank sum test. Adjusted comparisons were made using analysis of variance models. RESULTS: Baseline differences between the groups included cancer type, with epidural patients more likely to have benign disease and PCA patients more likely to have ovarian cancer. Pain scores on postoperative days 0 and 1 were significantly lower for users of epidurals versus PCA (1.5 vs. 3.8, P < 0.001; and 2.0 vs. 3.2, P < 0.001, respectively). Pain scores on days 2 through 4 were not significantly different. Patients with benign disease had a shorter length of stay than those with cancer (3.2 vs. 5.3, P < 0.001) and tolerated a general diet sooner (2.5 vs. 3.9, P < 0.001), irrespective of pain management type. Patients with epidurals were more likely to experience hypotension (21% vs. 7%, P = 0.02). Patients with PCA were more likely to receive a blood transfusion (26% vs. 7%. P = 0.002). There were no other differences in postoperative adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that patients experience superior pain relief with epidurals compared with PCA, with minor differences in postoperative adverse events.
AB - OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of epidural versus patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) for postoperative pain management in patients undergoing laparotomies for gynecologic cancer. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 172 patients (86 in each group) undergoing laparotomy from May 2004 to August 2005 was identified. Information from medical records was abstracted, including patient characteristics, cancer type, surgical procedure, postoperative complications, pain scores, day tolerating general diet, and discharge day. Groups were compared using the χ test for association and Wilcoxon rank sum test. Adjusted comparisons were made using analysis of variance models. RESULTS: Baseline differences between the groups included cancer type, with epidural patients more likely to have benign disease and PCA patients more likely to have ovarian cancer. Pain scores on postoperative days 0 and 1 were significantly lower for users of epidurals versus PCA (1.5 vs. 3.8, P < 0.001; and 2.0 vs. 3.2, P < 0.001, respectively). Pain scores on days 2 through 4 were not significantly different. Patients with benign disease had a shorter length of stay than those with cancer (3.2 vs. 5.3, P < 0.001) and tolerated a general diet sooner (2.5 vs. 3.9, P < 0.001), irrespective of pain management type. Patients with epidurals were more likely to experience hypotension (21% vs. 7%, P = 0.02). Patients with PCA were more likely to receive a blood transfusion (26% vs. 7%. P = 0.002). There were no other differences in postoperative adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that patients experience superior pain relief with epidurals compared with PCA, with minor differences in postoperative adverse events.
KW - Epidural
KW - Gynecology
KW - Pain
KW - Patient-controlled analgesia
KW - Pelvic surgery
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548461621&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548461621&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/SPV.0b013e3181250725
DO - 10.1097/SPV.0b013e3181250725
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:34548461621
SN - 1542-5983
VL - 13
SP - 191
EP - 196
JO - Journal of Pelvic Medicine and Surgery
JF - Journal of Pelvic Medicine and Surgery
IS - 4
ER -