Evidence-based risk stratification for sport medicine procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic

Betina B. Hinckel, Charles A. Baumann, Leandro Ejnisman, Leonardo M. Cavinatto, Alexander Martusiewicz, Miho J. Tanaka, Marc Tompkins, Seth L. Sherman, Jorge A. Chahla, Rachel Frank, Guilherme L. Yamamoto, James Bicos, Liza Arendt, Donald Fithian, Jack Farr

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Orthopaedic practices have been markedly affected by the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite the ban on elective procedures, it is impossible to define the medical urgency of a case solely on whether a case is on an elective surgery schedule. Orthopaedic surgical procedures should consider COVID-19-associated risks and an assimilation of all available disease dependent, disease independent, and logistical information that is tailored to each patient, institution, and region. Using an evidence-based risk stratification of clinical urgency, we provide a framework for prioritization of orthopaedic sport medicine procedures that encompasses such factors. This can be used to facilitate the risk-benefit assessment of the timing and setting of a procedure during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number00083
JournalJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews
Volume4
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evidence-based risk stratification for sport medicine procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this