Exploring Physician Perceptions of the 2018 United States Heart Transplant Allocation System

ERSILIA M. DEFILIPPIS, MITCHELL A. PSOTKA, PRATEETI KHAZANIE, JENNIFER COWGER, REBECCA COGSWELL

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: After the implementation of the 2018 US heart transplant allocation system, the experience and perceptions of heart transplant clinicians have not been well-cataloged. Methods and Results: This web-based survey of both heart failure cardiologists and surgeons examined physician perspectives about the policy changes and whether the system is meeting its intended goals. The majority of participants (94%, n = 113) responded that the 2018 heart allocation system requires modification. Eighty-four percent reported using more temporary mechanical circulatory support to achieve higher status and 86% were concerned about the change in physician behavior and practices under the new system. Conclusions: Suggestions for possible improvement included higher status for patients on durable left ventricular assist device support, changes to criteria for status 2, modification of status exceptions, and advocacy for a heart allocation score.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)670-674
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of cardiac failure
Volume28
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Inc.

Keywords

  • Heart transplantation
  • mechanical circulatory support
  • organ allocation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Exploring Physician Perceptions of the 2018 United States Heart Transplant Allocation System'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this