Framework and Schema are False Synonyms: Defining Terms to Improve Learning

Jessica J. Dreicer, Andrew S. Parsons, Tony Joudi, Scott Stern, Andrew P.J. Olson, Joseph J. Rencic

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Clinical reasoning is an essential expertise of health care professionals that includes the complex cognitive processes that lead to diagnosis and management decisions. In order to optimally teach, learn, and assess clinical reasoning, it is imperative for teachers and learners to have a shared understanding of the language. Currently, educators use the terms schema and framework interchangeably but they are distinct concepts. In this paper, we offer definitions for schema and framework and use the high-stakes field of aviation to demonstrate the interplay of these concepts. We offer examples of framework and schema in the medical education field and discuss how a clear understanding of these concepts allows for greater intentionality when teaching and assessing clinical reasoning.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)294-303
Number of pages10
JournalPerspectives on Medical Education
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s).

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Framework and Schema are False Synonyms: Defining Terms to Improve Learning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this