Hook length biases and general linear partition inequalities

Cristina Ballantine, Hannah E. Burson, William Craig, Amanda Folsom, Boya Wen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Motivated in part by hook-content formulas for certain restricted partitions in representation theory, we consider the total number of hooks of fixed length in odd versus distinct partitions. We show that there are more hooks of length 2, respectively 3, in all odd partitions of n than in all distinct partitions of n, and make the analogous conjecture for arbitrary hook length t≥ 2 . We also establish additional bias results on the number of gaps of size 1, respectively 2, in all odd versus distinct partitions of n. We conjecture similar biases and asymptotics, as well as congruences for the number of hooks of fixed length in odd distinct partitions versus self-conjugate partitions. An integral component of the proof of our bias result for hooks of length 3 is a linear inequality involving q(n), the number of distinct partitions of n. In this article we also establish effective linear inequalities for q(n) in great generality, a result which is of independent interest. Our methods are both analytic and combinatorial, and our results and conjectures intersect the areas of representation theory, analytic number theory, partition theory, and q-series. In particular, we use a Rademacher-type exact formula for q(n), Wright’s circle method, modularity, q-series transformations, asymptotic methods, and combinatorial arguments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number41
JournalResearch in Mathematical Sciences
Volume10
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Keywords

  • Distinct partitions
  • Hook length
  • Odd partitions
  • Partition asymptotics
  • Partition inequalities

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Hook length biases and general linear partition inequalities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this