How Are Leading Research Institutions Engaging with Data Sharing Tools and Programs?

Eric S. Hall, Genevieve B. Melton, Philip R.O. Payne, David A. Dorr, David K. Vawdrey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

With widespread electronic health record (EHR) adoption and improvements in health information interoperability in the United States, troves of data are available for knowledge discovery. Several data sharing programs and tools have been developed to support research activities, including efforts funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), EHR vendors, and other public- and private-sector entities. We surveyed 65 leading research institutions (77% response rate) about their use of and value derived from ten programs/tools, including NIH's Accrual to Clinical Trials, Epic Corporation's Cosmos, and the Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics consortium. Most institutions participated in multiple programs/tools but reported relatively low usage (even when they participated, they frequently indicated that fewer than one individual/month benefitted from the platform to support research activities). Our findings suggest that investments in research data sharing have not yet achieved desired results.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)397-406
Number of pages10
JournalAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium
Volume2023
StatePublished - 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
©2023 AMIA - All rights reserved.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How Are Leading Research Institutions Engaging with Data Sharing Tools and Programs?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this