How do social media users process cancer prevention messages on Facebook? An eye-tracking study

Wen ying Sylvia Chou; Neha Trivedi; Emily Peterson; Anna Gaysynsky; Mindy Krakow; Emily Vraga

doi:10.1016/j.pec.2020.01.013

How do social media users process cancer prevention messages on Facebook? An eye-tracking study

Wen ying Sylvia Chou, Neha Trivedi, Emily Peterson, Anna Gaysynsky, Mindy Krakow, Emily Vraga

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

22 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: The quality of cancer-related information on social media (SM) is mixed, and exposure to inaccurate information may negatively affect knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors. This study examines SM users’ attention to simulated Facebook posts related to cancer and identifies message features associated with increased attention. Methods: SM users (N = 53) participated in a mixed methods experimental study using eye-tracking technology, whereby participants’ dwell time on message components was measured. Stimuli conditions included message format (narrative/non-narrative), information veracity, source (organization/individual), and cancer topic (HPV vaccine and sunscreen safety). Results: Pixel-size adjusted analyses revealed that average dwell time was longer on posts attributed to individuals and on narrative-based posts. The source of the message received nearly the same amount of dwell time as the text. Dwell time on other message components did not significantly differ by condition. Conclusion: This study found that the source of a message attracted substantial attention, whereas other features were not associated with attention. The study illustrates how communication research can help us understand the processing of ubiquitous cancer-related messages on SM. Practical Implications: Health communication practitioners should consider message features that garner attention when developing efforts to facilitate the exchange of evidence-based information and to mitigate the harms of misinformation.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	1161-1167
Number of pages	7
Journal	Patient Education and Counseling
Volume	103
Issue number	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2020.01.013
State	Published - Jun 2020
Externally published	Yes

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
We would like to thank the following colleagues for their assistance with various aspects of the project: Sheel Shah, Jonathan Strohl, Edward Peirce of Fors Marsh Group, Anita Ousley and Silvia Salazar of the NCI HSI lab, Naomi Brown of Userworks, Dahye Yoon of Georgetown University, and Katherine Hyatt Hawkins of George Mason University. Work related to this manuscript was done as part of the Authors’ research responsibilities as National Cancer Institute employees. Views expressed in the paper do not represent the official positions of the National Cancer Institute, NIH.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020

Keywords

Cancer communication
Eye tracking
HPV vaccine
Misinformation
Social media
Sun safety

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access

10.1016/j.pec.2020.01.013

OpenUrl availability

Full text

Cite this

@article{f50a9ea2058b4f2383f0d45b4556ea98,

title = "How do social media users process cancer prevention messages on Facebook? An eye-tracking study",

abstract = "Objective: The quality of cancer-related information on social media (SM) is mixed, and exposure to inaccurate information may negatively affect knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors. This study examines SM users{\textquoteright} attention to simulated Facebook posts related to cancer and identifies message features associated with increased attention. Methods: SM users (N = 53) participated in a mixed methods experimental study using eye-tracking technology, whereby participants{\textquoteright} dwell time on message components was measured. Stimuli conditions included message format (narrative/non-narrative), information veracity, source (organization/individual), and cancer topic (HPV vaccine and sunscreen safety). Results: Pixel-size adjusted analyses revealed that average dwell time was longer on posts attributed to individuals and on narrative-based posts. The source of the message received nearly the same amount of dwell time as the text. Dwell time on other message components did not significantly differ by condition. Conclusion: This study found that the source of a message attracted substantial attention, whereas other features were not associated with attention. The study illustrates how communication research can help us understand the processing of ubiquitous cancer-related messages on SM. Practical Implications: Health communication practitioners should consider message features that garner attention when developing efforts to facilitate the exchange of evidence-based information and to mitigate the harms of misinformation.",

keywords = "Cancer communication, Eye tracking, HPV vaccine, Misinformation, Social media, Sun safety",

author = "Chou, {Wen ying Sylvia} and Neha Trivedi and Emily Peterson and Anna Gaysynsky and Mindy Krakow and Emily Vraga",

note = "Funding Information: We would like to thank the following colleagues for their assistance with various aspects of the project: Sheel Shah, Jonathan Strohl, Edward Peirce of Fors Marsh Group, Anita Ousley and Silvia Salazar of the NCI HSI lab, Naomi Brown of Userworks, Dahye Yoon of Georgetown University, and Katherine Hyatt Hawkins of George Mason University. Work related to this manuscript was done as part of the Authors{\textquoteright} research responsibilities as National Cancer Institute employees. Views expressed in the paper do not represent the official positions of the National Cancer Institute, NIH. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020",

year = "2020",

month = jun,

doi = "10.1016/j.pec.2020.01.013",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "103",

pages = "1161--1167",

journal = "Patient Education and Counseling",

issn = "0738-3991",

publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How do social media users process cancer prevention messages on Facebook? An eye-tracking study

AU - Chou, Wen ying Sylvia

AU - Trivedi, Neha

AU - Peterson, Emily

AU - Gaysynsky, Anna

AU - Krakow, Mindy

AU - Vraga, Emily

N1 - Funding Information: We would like to thank the following colleagues for their assistance with various aspects of the project: Sheel Shah, Jonathan Strohl, Edward Peirce of Fors Marsh Group, Anita Ousley and Silvia Salazar of the NCI HSI lab, Naomi Brown of Userworks, Dahye Yoon of Georgetown University, and Katherine Hyatt Hawkins of George Mason University. Work related to this manuscript was done as part of the Authors’ research responsibilities as National Cancer Institute employees. Views expressed in the paper do not represent the official positions of the National Cancer Institute, NIH. Publisher Copyright: © 2020

PY - 2020/6

Y1 - 2020/6

N2 - Objective: The quality of cancer-related information on social media (SM) is mixed, and exposure to inaccurate information may negatively affect knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors. This study examines SM users’ attention to simulated Facebook posts related to cancer and identifies message features associated with increased attention. Methods: SM users (N = 53) participated in a mixed methods experimental study using eye-tracking technology, whereby participants’ dwell time on message components was measured. Stimuli conditions included message format (narrative/non-narrative), information veracity, source (organization/individual), and cancer topic (HPV vaccine and sunscreen safety). Results: Pixel-size adjusted analyses revealed that average dwell time was longer on posts attributed to individuals and on narrative-based posts. The source of the message received nearly the same amount of dwell time as the text. Dwell time on other message components did not significantly differ by condition. Conclusion: This study found that the source of a message attracted substantial attention, whereas other features were not associated with attention. The study illustrates how communication research can help us understand the processing of ubiquitous cancer-related messages on SM. Practical Implications: Health communication practitioners should consider message features that garner attention when developing efforts to facilitate the exchange of evidence-based information and to mitigate the harms of misinformation.

AB - Objective: The quality of cancer-related information on social media (SM) is mixed, and exposure to inaccurate information may negatively affect knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors. This study examines SM users’ attention to simulated Facebook posts related to cancer and identifies message features associated with increased attention. Methods: SM users (N = 53) participated in a mixed methods experimental study using eye-tracking technology, whereby participants’ dwell time on message components was measured. Stimuli conditions included message format (narrative/non-narrative), information veracity, source (organization/individual), and cancer topic (HPV vaccine and sunscreen safety). Results: Pixel-size adjusted analyses revealed that average dwell time was longer on posts attributed to individuals and on narrative-based posts. The source of the message received nearly the same amount of dwell time as the text. Dwell time on other message components did not significantly differ by condition. Conclusion: This study found that the source of a message attracted substantial attention, whereas other features were not associated with attention. The study illustrates how communication research can help us understand the processing of ubiquitous cancer-related messages on SM. Practical Implications: Health communication practitioners should consider message features that garner attention when developing efforts to facilitate the exchange of evidence-based information and to mitigate the harms of misinformation.

KW - Cancer communication

KW - Eye tracking

KW - HPV vaccine

KW - Misinformation

KW - Social media

KW - Sun safety

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85079074559&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85079074559&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.pec.2020.01.013

DO - 10.1016/j.pec.2020.01.013

M3 - Article

C2 - 32044193

AN - SCOPUS:85079074559

SN - 0738-3991

VL - 103

SP - 1161

EP - 1167

JO - Patient Education and Counseling

JF - Patient Education and Counseling

IS - 6

ER -

How do social media users process cancer prevention messages on Facebook? An eye-tracking study

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

UN SDGs

Access

OpenUrl availability

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this