Abstract
A common assumption of data analysis in clinical trials is that the patient population, as well as treatment effects, do not vary during the course of the study. However, when trials enroll patients over several years, this hypothesis may be violated. Ignoring variations of the outcome distributions over time, under the control and experimental treatments, can lead to biased treatment effect estimates and poor control of false positive results. We propose and compare two procedures that account for possible variations of the outcome distributions over time, to correct treatment effect estimates, and to control type-I error rates. The first procedure models trends of patient outcomes with splines. The second leverages conditional inference principles, which have been introduced to analyze randomized trials when patient prognostic profiles are unbalanced across arms. These two procedures are applicable in response-adaptive clinical trials. We illustrate the consequences of trends in the outcome distributions in response-adaptive designs and in platform trials, and investigate the proposed methods in the analysis of a glioblastoma study.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 381-393 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Biometrics |
Volume | 79 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Mar 2023 |
Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2021 The International Biometric Society.
Keywords
- adaptive trial design
- bootstrap
- glioblastoma
- platform trials
- population trends
- splines