TY - JOUR
T1 - Intergroup Disparities and Implicit Bias
T2 - A Commentary
AU - Fisher, Emily L.
AU - Borgida, Eugene
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2012 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2012/6
Y1 - 2012/6
N2 - Despite changing societal norms that are less tolerant of overt discrimination, demonstrable disparities between racial and gender groups remain. The contributors to this impressive special issue document and offer explanations for these disparities in employment and professional contexts, and with regard to disparate outcomes associated with the legal system, and in medical and health care contexts. In our commentary, we examine these aggregate-level disparities and the individual-level explanatory accounts proposed for their existence. The evidence that these papers present is often enough to rule out alternative explanatory accounts, and implicit bias remains a viable account for disparities that, to varying degrees, fit with the available data and the claim that implicit biases are contributing to an understanding of ongoing real-world disparities. As such, we believe that implicit bias research will continue to play a crucial role in understanding and hopefully reducing these aggregate-level disparities in employment, legal, and health care domains.
AB - Despite changing societal norms that are less tolerant of overt discrimination, demonstrable disparities between racial and gender groups remain. The contributors to this impressive special issue document and offer explanations for these disparities in employment and professional contexts, and with regard to disparate outcomes associated with the legal system, and in medical and health care contexts. In our commentary, we examine these aggregate-level disparities and the individual-level explanatory accounts proposed for their existence. The evidence that these papers present is often enough to rule out alternative explanatory accounts, and implicit bias remains a viable account for disparities that, to varying degrees, fit with the available data and the claim that implicit biases are contributing to an understanding of ongoing real-world disparities. As such, we believe that implicit bias research will continue to play a crucial role in understanding and hopefully reducing these aggregate-level disparities in employment, legal, and health care domains.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862854769&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84862854769&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2012.01753.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2012.01753.x
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84862854769
SN - 0022-4537
VL - 68
SP - 385
EP - 398
JO - Journal of Social Issues
JF - Journal of Social Issues
IS - 2
ER -