Lake States natural resource managers’ perspectives on forest land parcelization and its implications for public land management

Michael A. Kilgore, Stephanie A. Snyder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Field-based public natural resource managers in the Lake States (MI, MN, WI) were surveyed for their perspectives on various aspects of private forest land parcelization. This includes their perceptions of recent changes in parcelization activity, drivers and impacts, mitigation strategies, and ability to influence parcelization. Their perspectives on the implications private forest land parcelization has on public land management were also sought. Across the Lake States, most public natural resource managers have witnessed an increasing frequency of forest land parcelization. They consider development potential and proximity to population centers to be the most influential driver of parcelization, with decreased timber supply and loss of recreational access on private land the most likely outcomes. The study documented important perceived linkages between private forest land parcelization and public land management, such as increased conflicts on public land, decreased access to public land, and increased demand for and cost of managing public land.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)320-328
Number of pages9
JournalLand Use Policy
Volume59
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 31 2016

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The authors wish to thank the public natural resource managers who participated in this study. Funding for this research was provided by the USDA Forest Service , Northern Research Station and the University of Minnesota’s Agricultural Experiment Station (project 42-054 ).

Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd

Keywords

  • Fragmentation
  • Parcellation
  • Private forest land ownership
  • Public forest land management
  • Subdivision

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Lake States natural resource managers’ perspectives on forest land parcelization and its implications for public land management'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this