Long-term effects of glucocorticoids on function, quality of life, and survival in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a prospective cohort study

CINRG Investigators

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

283 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Glucocorticoid treatment is recommended as a standard of care in Duchenne muscular dystrophy; however, few studies have assessed the long-term benefits of this treatment. We examined the long-term effects of glucocorticoids on milestone-related disease progression across the lifespan and survival in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Methods: For this prospective cohort study, we enrolled male patients aged 2–28 years with Duchenne muscular dystrophy at 20 centres in nine countries. Patients were followed up for 10 years. We compared no glucocorticoid treatment or cumulative treatment duration of less than 1 month versus treatment of 1 year or longer with regard to progression of nine disease-related and clinically meaningful mobility and upper limb milestones. We used Kaplan-Meier analyses to compare glucocorticoid treatment groups for time to stand from supine of 5 s or longer and 10 s or longer, and loss of stand from supine, four-stair climb, ambulation, full overhead reach, hand-to-mouth function, and hand function. Risk of death was also assessed. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00468832. Findings: 440 patients were enrolled during two recruitment periods (2006–09 and 2012–16). Time to all disease progression milestone events was significantly longer in patients treated with glucocorticoids for 1 year or longer than in patients treated for less than 1 month or never treated (log-rank p<0·0001). Glucocorticoid treatment for 1 year or longer was associated with increased median age at loss of mobility milestones by 2·1–4·4 years and upper limb milestones by 2·8–8·0 years compared with treatment for less than 1 month. Deflazacort was associated with increased median age at loss of three milestones by 2·1–2·7 years in comparison with prednisone or prednisolone (log-rank p<0·012). 45 patients died during the 10-year follow-up. 39 (87%) of these deaths were attributable to Duchenne-related causes in patients with known duration of glucocorticoids usage. 28 (9%) deaths occurred in 311 patients treated with glucocorticoids for 1 year or longer compared with 11 (19%) deaths in 58 patients with no history of glucocorticoid use (odds ratio 0·47, 95% CI 0·22–1·00; p=0·0501). Interpretation: In patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy, glucocorticoid treatment is associated with reduced risk of losing clinically meaningful mobility and upper limb disease progression milestones across the lifespan as well as reduced risk of death. Funding: US Department of Education/National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research; US Department of Defense; National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases; and Parent Project Muscular Dystrophy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)451-461
Number of pages11
JournalThe Lancet
Volume391
Issue number10119
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 3 2018

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This study was supported by US Department of Education/NIDRR (#H133B031118, #H133B090001); US Department of Defense (#W81XWH-12-1-0417); National Institutes of Health/NIAMS (#R01AR061875); and Parent Project Muscular Dystrophy. We thank the boys, men, and their families for their dedication and cooperation with the study conduct. We also thank individuals who were instrumental in the conduct of this study and the collection of data, particularly CINRG investigators, and CINRG clinical coordinators, clinical evaluator trainers, clinical evaluators, study coordinators, and supporting staff ( appendix pp 27–28 ).

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Ltd

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Long-term effects of glucocorticoids on function, quality of life, and survival in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a prospective cohort study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this