TY - JOUR
T1 - Maternal Outcomes in Subsequent Pregnancies after Classical Cesarean Delivery
AU - Thompson, Beatrix B.
AU - Reddy, Uma M.
AU - Burn, Martina
AU - Abdel-Razeq, Sonya
AU - Xu, Xiao
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/8/1
Y1 - 2022/8/1
N2 - OBJECTIVE:To compare maternal outcomes in subsequent pregnancies of patients who had a prior classical cesarean delivery with those with a prior low transverse cesarean delivery.METHODS:We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of patients with live singleton births at or after 24 weeks of gestation who had a prior classical cesarean delivery or a low transverse cesarean delivery in the 2016-2019 National Inpatient Sample database. Outcome measures included mode of delivery, uterine rupture, and severe maternal morbidity (SMM), as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Maternal outcomes were compared using the χ2test and the propensity score method, accounting for differences in patients' clinical risk factors. Multivariable regressions further assessed how patients' sociodemographic and hospital characteristics might influence the differences in maternal outcomes between the two groups.RESULTS:The sample included 1,671,249 patients: 25,540 with prior classical cesarean delivery and 1,645,709 with prior low transverse cesarean delivery. Cesarean delivery occurred in 95.5% of patients with prior classical cesarean compared with 91.3% of those with prior low transverse delivery (P<.001; propensity score method: odds ratio [OR] 0.99, 95% CI 0.85-1.16) and uterine rupture occurred in 1.1% and 0.3%, respectively (P<.001; propensity score method: OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.40-3.36). Among patients with prior classical cesarean delivery, uterine rupture occurred in 10.6% of those who underwent labor compared with 0.3% of those who did not (P<.001). Rates of SMM were 5.9% and 2.0% in the two groups, respectively (P<.001; propensity score method: OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.53-2.29). After adjustment of maternal sociodemographic and hospital characteristics, differences in the risk of uterine rupture and SMM between the two groups were attenuated but remained significant.CONCLUSION:Prior classical cesarean delivery was associated with a higher risk of uterine rupture and SMM in subsequent pregnancies, compared with prior low transverse cesarean delivery, even after accounting for patients' clinical, sociodemographic, and hospital characteristics.
AB - OBJECTIVE:To compare maternal outcomes in subsequent pregnancies of patients who had a prior classical cesarean delivery with those with a prior low transverse cesarean delivery.METHODS:We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of patients with live singleton births at or after 24 weeks of gestation who had a prior classical cesarean delivery or a low transverse cesarean delivery in the 2016-2019 National Inpatient Sample database. Outcome measures included mode of delivery, uterine rupture, and severe maternal morbidity (SMM), as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Maternal outcomes were compared using the χ2test and the propensity score method, accounting for differences in patients' clinical risk factors. Multivariable regressions further assessed how patients' sociodemographic and hospital characteristics might influence the differences in maternal outcomes between the two groups.RESULTS:The sample included 1,671,249 patients: 25,540 with prior classical cesarean delivery and 1,645,709 with prior low transverse cesarean delivery. Cesarean delivery occurred in 95.5% of patients with prior classical cesarean compared with 91.3% of those with prior low transverse delivery (P<.001; propensity score method: odds ratio [OR] 0.99, 95% CI 0.85-1.16) and uterine rupture occurred in 1.1% and 0.3%, respectively (P<.001; propensity score method: OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.40-3.36). Among patients with prior classical cesarean delivery, uterine rupture occurred in 10.6% of those who underwent labor compared with 0.3% of those who did not (P<.001). Rates of SMM were 5.9% and 2.0% in the two groups, respectively (P<.001; propensity score method: OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.53-2.29). After adjustment of maternal sociodemographic and hospital characteristics, differences in the risk of uterine rupture and SMM between the two groups were attenuated but remained significant.CONCLUSION:Prior classical cesarean delivery was associated with a higher risk of uterine rupture and SMM in subsequent pregnancies, compared with prior low transverse cesarean delivery, even after accounting for patients' clinical, sociodemographic, and hospital characteristics.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85134553343&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85134553343&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004869
DO - 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004869
M3 - Article
C2 - 35852271
AN - SCOPUS:85134553343
SN - 0029-7844
VL - 140
SP - 212
EP - 219
JO - Obstetrics and gynecology
JF - Obstetrics and gynecology
IS - 2
ER -