Measuring Support for Welfare Policies: Implications for the Effects of Race and Deservingness Stereotypes

Kirill Zhirkov, Kristin Lunz Trujillo, C. Daniel Myers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

What are the relative contributions of stereotypes about the race and deservingness of welfare recipients to Americans' opinions on welfare? A recent study employing a conjoint-experimental method finds that Americans' stereotypes of welfare recipients as undeserving drive negative attitudes toward welfare, while stereotypes of welfare recipients as Black have little effect. However, this finding may be produced by the measure of welfare attitudes that includes questions implicating deservingness. We implement a conceptual replication of that study using different measures of welfare policy opinions that directly ask respondents about spending, both on welfare generally and on specific welfare programs. We show that when support for welfare is measured using the spending questions, stereotypes about race are significantly associated with opposition to welfare. These results have important implications for the debate on Americans' opposition to welfare programs, as well as for the measurement of policy opinions in surveys.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Experimental Political Science
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of American Political Science Association.

Keywords

  • conjoint experiments
  • public opinion
  • stereotypes
  • survey methods
  • welfare

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Measuring Support for Welfare Policies: Implications for the Effects of Race and Deservingness Stereotypes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this