TY - JOUR
T1 - Membership has its privileges
T2 - The changing benefits of statehood
AU - Fazal, Tanisha M.
AU - Griffiths, Ryan D.
PY - 2014/3
Y1 - 2014/3
N2 - We argue that system-level international changes have made secessionism more attractive since 1945, and that this is one of the reasons for the recent proliferation of aspiring states. Using original data on secessionist movements between 1816 and 2011, we document that secessionism became significantly more common after 1945. Whereas much of the existing literature explains secessionism by pointing to local or unit-level factors, we contend that security, economic, and normative changes at the international level have effectively increased the benefits of independence, without a commensurate increase in the costs. We use interviews with representatives of new states, secessionist groups, and international organizations to provide empirical support for these claims. We conclude by considering three extensions of our argument: (i) Does the nature of the changing international environment affect the way in which secessionists attempt to achieve their goals? (ii) What future changes might amplify or depress this trend? (iii) Who are the specific people benefiting from statehood, and can their position within a would-be state help us understand the nature of secessionism today?
AB - We argue that system-level international changes have made secessionism more attractive since 1945, and that this is one of the reasons for the recent proliferation of aspiring states. Using original data on secessionist movements between 1816 and 2011, we document that secessionism became significantly more common after 1945. Whereas much of the existing literature explains secessionism by pointing to local or unit-level factors, we contend that security, economic, and normative changes at the international level have effectively increased the benefits of independence, without a commensurate increase in the costs. We use interviews with representatives of new states, secessionist groups, and international organizations to provide empirical support for these claims. We conclude by considering three extensions of our argument: (i) Does the nature of the changing international environment affect the way in which secessionists attempt to achieve their goals? (ii) What future changes might amplify or depress this trend? (iii) Who are the specific people benefiting from statehood, and can their position within a would-be state help us understand the nature of secessionism today?
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84897071813&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84897071813&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/misr.12099
DO - 10.1111/misr.12099
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84897071813
SN - 1521-9488
VL - 16
SP - 79
EP - 106
JO - International Studies Review
JF - International Studies Review
IS - 1
ER -