Meta-analytical evidence that males prefer virgin females

Jon Richardson, Marlene Zuk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Males are often predicted to prefer virgin over non-virgin females because of the reduced risk of sperm competition. Does this prediction hold across studies? Our systematic meta-analysis of 138 studies, mainly conducted in invertebrates, confirms that males generally prefer virgin females. However, males preferred virgin females even in species with last male sperm precedence, suggesting that sperm competition alone does not drive male preferences. Furthermore, our results suggest that males may reject mated females even when no alternative exists. Preference for virgins is unlikely to influence female reproductive success since virginity cannot be selected for, but strong preference for virgin females could swamp or reinforce selection on other traits. Our results add to growing evidence that males are not indiscriminate in mating. However, given the unexplained heterogeneity in effect sizes, we urge caution in assuming that males will prefer virgins and recommend considering the natural context of mating decisions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere14341
JournalEcology letters
Volume27
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. Ecology Letters published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords

  • female mating status
  • male preference
  • mate choice
  • meta-analysis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Meta-analytical evidence that males prefer virgin females'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this