One year on: What we have learned about the psychological effects of COVID-19 social restrictions: A meta-analysis

Laura Knox, Gery C. Karantzas, Daniel Romano, Judith A. Feeney, Jeffry A. Simpson

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

30 Scopus citations

Abstract

This article reports on the first meta-analysis of studies on the association between government-imposed social restrictions and mental health outcomes published during the initial year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Thirty-three studies (N = 131,844) were included. Social restrictions were significantly associated with increased mental health symptoms overall (d =.41 [CI 95%.17–.65]), including depression (d =.83 [CI 95%.30–1.37]), stress (d =.21 [CI 95%.01–.42]) and loneliness (d =.30 [CI 95%.07–.52]), but not anxiety (d =.26 [CI 95% −.04–.56]). Subgroup analyses demonstrated that the strictness and length of restrictions had divergent effects on mental health outcomes, but there are concerns regarding study quality. The findings provide critical insights for future research on the effects of COVID-19 social restrictions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number101315
JournalCurrent Opinion in Psychology
Volume46
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Ltd

Keywords

  • COVID-19
  • Lockdown
  • Loneliness
  • Mental health
  • Meta-analysis

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article
  • Meta-Analysis
  • Review

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'One year on: What we have learned about the psychological effects of COVID-19 social restrictions: A meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this