Oral Lipid Nanocrystal Amphotericin B for Cryptococcal Meningitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

David R. Boulware, Mucunguzi Atukunda, Enock Kagimu, Abdu K. Musubire, Andrew Akampurira, Lillian Tugume, Kenneth Ssebambulidde, John Kasibante, Laura Nsangi, Timothy Mugabi, Jane Gakuru, Sarah Kimuda, Derrick Kasozi, Suzan Namombwe, Isaac Turyasingura, Morris K. Rutakingirwa, Edward Mpoza, Enos Kigozi, Conrad Muzoora, Jayne EllisCaleb P. Skipper, Theresa Matkovits, Peter R. Williamson, Darlisha A. Williams, Ann Fieberg, Kathy H. Hullsiek, Mahsa Abassi, Biyue Dai, David B. Meya

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background. Amphotericin B is the gold standard treatment for severe mycoses. A new orally delivered, less-toxic formulation of amphotericin has been developed. Methods. In our randomized clinical trial, we tested oral lipid nanocrystal (LNC) amphotericin B (MAT2203, Matinas Biopharma) vs intravenous (IV) amphotericin for human immunodeficiency virus–associated cryptococcal meningitis in 4 sequential cohorts. Two pilot cohorts assessed safety and tolerability (n = 10 each), and 2 cohorts assessed efficacy with/ without 2 IV loading doses (n = 40 each). The experimental arm received 1.8 g/d oral LNC amphotericin through 2 weeks with 100 mg/kg/d flucytosine, then 1.2 g/d LNC amphotericin through 6 weeks. The randomized control arm (n = 41) received 7 days of IV amphotericin with flucytosine, then 7 days of fluconazole 1200 mg/d. The primary end point was cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) early fungicidal activity (EFA). Results. We randomized 80 participants to oral LNC amphotericin + flucytosine with (n = 40) and without (n = 40) 2 IV loading doses and 41 control participants to IV amphotericin + flucytosine. Mean EFA was 0.40 log10 colony-forming units (CFU)/mL/d for all-oral LNC amphotericin, 0.42 log10 Cryptococcus CFU/mL/d for oral LNC amphotericin with IV loading doses, and 0.46 log10 CFU/mL/d for IV amphotericin controls. LNC amphotericin groups achieved 2-week CSF sterility in 63% (44 of 70) vs 68% (23 of 34) of controls. The 18-week survival was 85% (34 of 40) with all-oral LNC amphotericin, 90% (36 of 40) with oral LNC amphotericin given IV loading doses, and 85% (35 of 41) with IV amphotericin. Grade 3–4 laboratory adverse events occurred less frequently in LNC amphotericin groups (41%) than the IV amphotericin group (61%, P = .05), particularly for anemia (21% vs 44%; P = .01) and potassium (5% vs 17%; P = .04). Conclusions. This new oral amphotericin B LNC formulation appears promising for cryptococcal meningitis with antifungal activity, similar survival, and less toxicity than IV amphotericin. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT04031833.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1659-1667
Number of pages9
JournalClinical Infectious Diseases
Volume77
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 15 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • AIDS-related opportunistic infection
  • HIV
  • amphotericin B
  • cryptococcal meningitis
  • randomized controlled trial

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Oral Lipid Nanocrystal Amphotericin B for Cryptococcal Meningitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this