Pregnancy intention and phthalate metabolites among pregnant women in The Infant Development and Environment Study cohort

Grace R. Lyden, Emily S. Barrett, Sheela Sathyanarayana, Nicole R. Bush, Shanna H. Swan, Ruby H.N. Nguyen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Preconception life style and health play a pivotal role in positively impacting the health of a pregnancy, and this includes the reduction of exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals such as phthalates. We have previously demonstrated that women planning a pregnancy with assisted reproductive technology (ART) have lower phthalate metabolite concentrations than their non–ART-using counterparts. Objective: To determine whether women who intended to become pregnant had lower phthalate metabolite concentrations than those who had an unintended pregnancy, or whether change in phthalate exposure across pregnancy differed between these two groups. Methods: A total of 721 women enrolled in The Infant Development and Environment Study (TIDES), a multicentre US prospective pregnancy cohort; 513 (71%) indicated their pregnancy was planned. Urine samples from first- and third-trimester visits were analysed for 10 specific-gravity-adjusted, natural-log-transformed phthalate metabolites. Simple and multivariable linear regression, adjusting for centre, race, age, income, marital status, and parity, were employed to determine whether phthalate metabolite concentrations differed by pregnancy intention. Results: In bivariate analyses, the geometric mean concentrations of all first-trimester and most third-trimester phthalates were higher in women with unplanned pregnancies. However, after covariate adjustment, only first-trimester monoisobutyl phthalate (MiBP) remained associated with pregnancy intention, and the association changed direction such that unplanned pregnancies had lower MiBP concentrations (ß −0.18, 95% CI −0.35, −0.02). Conclusions: We did not find evidence of a difference in phthalate exposure between pregnancy planners and non-planners.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)736-743
Number of pages8
JournalPaediatric and perinatal epidemiology
Volume34
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2020

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Funding for TIDES was provided by the following grants from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences: R01 ES016863‐04 and R01 ES016863‐02S4. This research was supported in part by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health (ZIA ES103313).

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd

Keywords

  • endocrine disruptors
  • phthalic acids
  • preconception care
  • pregnancy
  • unplanned pregnancy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pregnancy intention and phthalate metabolites among pregnant women in The Infant Development and Environment Study cohort'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this