Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing the effect of Monocryl versus nylon sutures on patient- and observer-assessed outcomes following carpal tunnel surgery

Edward Wu, Robert Allen, Christopher Bayne, Robert Szabo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Controversy remains regarding the optimal technique and suture type for wound closure after carpal tunnel surgery. Adult patients undergoing open carpal tunnel release were prospectively randomized to receive either interrupted, buried Monocryl sutures or traditional nylon horizontal mattress sutures for their wound closures. At the 2-week and 6-week postoperative visits, Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale questionnaires were completed. At 2 weeks, patients and observers had a significantly better opinion of incisions closed with Monocryl. By 6 weeks, neither patients nor observers found a difference between suture types in any category. Scars of wounds closed with Monocryl did not change appreciably in appearance between 2 and 6 weeks. However, patients and observers noted significant improvement in scar appearance in the nylon group over time. Monocryl suture represents an effective method for carpal tunnel closure that leads to improved patient- and observer-reported outcome scores in the early postoperative period compared with nylon. Level of evidence: II.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1014-1021
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Hand Surgery: European Volume
Volume48
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2023.

Keywords

  • Carpal tunnel
  • Monocryl
  • POSAS
  • randomized controlled trial
  • scar
  • suture

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Journal Article

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing the effect of Monocryl versus nylon sutures on patient- and observer-assessed outcomes following carpal tunnel surgery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this