TY - JOUR
T1 - Rating the importance of nursing home residents' quality of life
AU - Kane, Robert L
AU - Rockwood, Todd H
AU - Hyer, Kathryn
AU - Desjardins, Karen
AU - Brassard, Andrea
AU - Gessert, Charles
AU - Kane, Rosalie A
PY - 2005/12
Y1 - 2005/12
N2 - OBJECTIVES: To assess how various stakeholders involved with nursing home care rate the importance of various quality-of-life (QoL) items for hypothetical residents with varying types of impairment. DESIGN: A community-based exploratory description of a convenience sample. SETTING: Eleven nursing homes in Florida, New Jersey, and Minnesota. PARTICIPANTS: Samples of registered and licensed nurses (RNs and LPNs), certified nursing assistants (CNAs), activities personnel, social workers, physicians, residents, and family members. MEASUREMENTS: Using a magnitude estimation approach, 17 QoL items were rated in order of importance on each of three hypothetical types of nursing home residents. RESULTS: Overall, there was little variation in the ratings for individual items. Ratings for persons with cognitive impairment were consistently lower. RNs'/LPNs' and CNAs' ratings were generally higher than the others, and physicians' ratings were generally lower. Residents' and families' ratings were generally lower than nurses' ratings. CONCLUSION: All stakeholders considered QoL to be important and felt that it deserves more attention in practice and regulation. A summary QoL score need not be weighted. Respondents (who were not cognitively impaired) considered QoL less important for residents with cognitive impairment. Value differences between those involved in nursing home care deserve more exploration.
AB - OBJECTIVES: To assess how various stakeholders involved with nursing home care rate the importance of various quality-of-life (QoL) items for hypothetical residents with varying types of impairment. DESIGN: A community-based exploratory description of a convenience sample. SETTING: Eleven nursing homes in Florida, New Jersey, and Minnesota. PARTICIPANTS: Samples of registered and licensed nurses (RNs and LPNs), certified nursing assistants (CNAs), activities personnel, social workers, physicians, residents, and family members. MEASUREMENTS: Using a magnitude estimation approach, 17 QoL items were rated in order of importance on each of three hypothetical types of nursing home residents. RESULTS: Overall, there was little variation in the ratings for individual items. Ratings for persons with cognitive impairment were consistently lower. RNs'/LPNs' and CNAs' ratings were generally higher than the others, and physicians' ratings were generally lower. Residents' and families' ratings were generally lower than nurses' ratings. CONCLUSION: All stakeholders considered QoL to be important and felt that it deserves more attention in practice and regulation. A summary QoL score need not be weighted. Respondents (who were not cognitively impaired) considered QoL less important for residents with cognitive impairment. Value differences between those involved in nursing home care deserve more exploration.
KW - Magnitude estimation
KW - Preferences
KW - Values
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=29344456406&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=29344456406&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.00493.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.00493.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 16398890
AN - SCOPUS:29344456406
SN - 0002-8614
VL - 53
SP - 2076
EP - 2082
JO - Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
JF - Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
IS - 12
ER -