TY - JOUR
T1 - Relational pluralism, organizational status, and the adoption of collegiate varsity esports programs in the US
AU - Lu, Landy Di
AU - Heinze, Kathryn
AU - Gong, Hua
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 European Association for Sport Management.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Research question: Sport management scholars often draw on institutional theory to examine the adoption of new approaches among sport organizations, but understanding of variation in innovation adoption remains limited. Using a relational perspective to better account for the complexity of the institutional environment, we examine the following questions in the context of esports: how do organizations’ ties to different entities across the field affect the adoption of innovations in sport? And how are these relationships shaped by organizational status? Research methods: Our sample includes 1274 universities and colleges in the U.S. We used event history analysis to investigate the influence of ties to field-level interest associations (i.e. athletic associations) and local-level peer networks (i.e. athletic conferences, state community settings) on organizational adoption of collegiate varsity esports programs. We also examined the moderating role of organizational status (i.e. university/college ranking). With respect to model selection, we used the Cox proportional hazard model. Results and findings: Results show that interest associations and local peer networks have a significant effect on the establishment of varsity esports programs. Additionally, organizational status moderates the influence of different relational ties (i.e. interest associations and peers) on esports adoption. Implications: : This study contributes to the institutional literature on innovation adoption in sport by revealing how relational pluralism and organizational status affect the adoption of new sport programs.
AB - Research question: Sport management scholars often draw on institutional theory to examine the adoption of new approaches among sport organizations, but understanding of variation in innovation adoption remains limited. Using a relational perspective to better account for the complexity of the institutional environment, we examine the following questions in the context of esports: how do organizations’ ties to different entities across the field affect the adoption of innovations in sport? And how are these relationships shaped by organizational status? Research methods: Our sample includes 1274 universities and colleges in the U.S. We used event history analysis to investigate the influence of ties to field-level interest associations (i.e. athletic associations) and local-level peer networks (i.e. athletic conferences, state community settings) on organizational adoption of collegiate varsity esports programs. We also examined the moderating role of organizational status (i.e. university/college ranking). With respect to model selection, we used the Cox proportional hazard model. Results and findings: Results show that interest associations and local peer networks have a significant effect on the establishment of varsity esports programs. Additionally, organizational status moderates the influence of different relational ties (i.e. interest associations and peers) on esports adoption. Implications: : This study contributes to the institutional literature on innovation adoption in sport by revealing how relational pluralism and organizational status affect the adoption of new sport programs.
KW - esports
KW - innovation adoption
KW - Institutional theory
KW - relational pluralism
KW - status
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85152425341&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85152425341&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/16184742.2023.2197927
DO - 10.1080/16184742.2023.2197927
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85152425341
SN - 1618-4742
JO - European Sport Management Quarterly
JF - European Sport Management Quarterly
ER -