Resistivity phase diagram of cuprates revisited

D. Pelc, M. J. Veit, C. J. Dorow, Y. Ge, N. Barišić, M. Greven

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Scopus citations

Abstract

The phase diagram of the cuprate superconductors has posed a formidable scientific challenge for more than three decades. This challenge is perhaps best exemplified by the need to understand the normal-state charge transport as the system evolves from Mott insulator to Fermi-liquid metal with doping. Here we report a detailed analysis of the temperature (T) and doping (p) dependence of the planar resistivity of simple-tetragonal HgBa2CuO4+δ (Hg1201), the single-CuO2-layer cuprate with the highest optimal superconducting transition temperature, Tc. The data allow us to test a recently proposed phenomenological model for the cuprate phase diagram that combines a universal transport scattering rate with spatially inhomogeneous (de)localization of the Mott-localized hole. We find that the model provides a good description of the data. We then extend this analysis to prior transport results for several other cuprates, including the Hall number in the overdoped part of the phase diagram, and find little compound-to-compound variation in the (de)localization gap scale. The results point to a robust, universal structural origin of the inherent gap inhomogeneity that is unrelated to doping-related disorder. They are inconsistent with the notion that much of the phase diagram is controlled by a quantum-critical point, and instead indicate that the unusual electronic properties exhibited by the cuprates are fundamentally related to strong nonlinearities associated with subtle nanoscale inhomogeneity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number075114
JournalPhysical Review B
Volume102
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 15 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 American Physical Society.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Resistivity phase diagram of cuprates revisited'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this