Response to comments on "Reconciliation of the Devils Hole climate record with orbital forcing"

Gina E. Moseley; Yuri V. Dublyansky; R. Lawrence Edwards; Kathleen A. Wendt; Mathieu Pythoud; Pu Zhang; Hai Cheng; Yanbin Lu; Ronny Boch; Christoph Spötl

doi:10.1126/science.aaf8679

Response to comments on "Reconciliation of the Devils Hole climate record with orbital forcing"

Gina E. Moseley, Yuri V. Dublyansky, R. Lawrence Edwards, Kathleen A. Wendt, Mathieu Pythoud, Pu Zhang, Hai Cheng, Yanbin Lu, Ronny Boch, Christoph Spötl

Earth and Environmental Sciences-Twin Cities

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Winograd and Coplen question the thorium-230 distribution model proposed to explain the age bias observed with increasing depth during Termination II. We have evaluated both criticisms and find that all samples display virtually identical fabrics, argue that the modern setting is not analogous to the conditions during Termination II, and reiterate the robustness of our age models. Our conclusions remain unchanged.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	296e
Journal	Science
Volume	354
Issue number	6310
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf8679
State	Published - Oct 21 2016

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, American Association for the Advancement of Science. All rights reserved.

Access

10.1126/science.aaf8679

OpenUrl availability

Full text

Cite this

@article{1b0b5cd3f9f44607a13827df154c6a89,

title = "Response to comments on {"}Reconciliation of the Devils Hole climate record with orbital forcing{"}",

abstract = "Winograd and Coplen question the thorium-230 distribution model proposed to explain the age bias observed with increasing depth during Termination II. We have evaluated both criticisms and find that all samples display virtually identical fabrics, argue that the modern setting is not analogous to the conditions during Termination II, and reiterate the robustness of our age models. Our conclusions remain unchanged.",

author = "Moseley, {Gina E.} and Dublyansky, {Yuri V.} and Edwards, {R. Lawrence} and Wendt, {Kathleen A.} and Mathieu Pythoud and Pu Zhang and Hai Cheng and Yanbin Lu and Ronny Boch and Christoph Sp{\"o}tl",

year = "2016",

month = oct,

day = "21",

doi = "10.1126/science.aaf8679",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "354",

pages = "296e",

journal = "Science",

issn = "0036-8075",

publisher = "American Association for the Advancement of Science",

number = "6310",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Response to comments on "Reconciliation of the Devils Hole climate record with orbital forcing"

AU - Moseley, Gina E.

AU - Dublyansky, Yuri V.

AU - Edwards, R. Lawrence

AU - Wendt, Kathleen A.

AU - Pythoud, Mathieu

AU - Zhang, Pu

AU - Cheng, Hai

AU - Lu, Yanbin

AU - Boch, Ronny

AU - Spötl, Christoph

PY - 2016/10/21

Y1 - 2016/10/21

N2 - Winograd and Coplen question the thorium-230 distribution model proposed to explain the age bias observed with increasing depth during Termination II. We have evaluated both criticisms and find that all samples display virtually identical fabrics, argue that the modern setting is not analogous to the conditions during Termination II, and reiterate the robustness of our age models. Our conclusions remain unchanged.

AB - Winograd and Coplen question the thorium-230 distribution model proposed to explain the age bias observed with increasing depth during Termination II. We have evaluated both criticisms and find that all samples display virtually identical fabrics, argue that the modern setting is not analogous to the conditions during Termination II, and reiterate the robustness of our age models. Our conclusions remain unchanged.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992029418&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84992029418&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1126/science.aaf8679

DO - 10.1126/science.aaf8679

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 27846529

AN - SCOPUS:84992029418

SN - 0036-8075

VL - 354

SP - 296e

JO - Science

JF - Science

IS - 6310

ER -

Response to comments on "Reconciliation of the Devils Hole climate record with orbital forcing"

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Access

OpenUrl availability

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this