Rethinking the uncertainty of African swine fever virus contamination in feed ingredients and risk of introduction into the United States

Rachel A. Schambow, Fernando Sampedro, Pedro E. Urriola, Jennifer L.G. van de Ligt, Andres Perez, Gerald C. Shurson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Economically relevant pathogens, such as African swine fever virus (ASFV), have been shown to survive when experimentally inoculated in some feed ingredients under the environmental conditions in transoceanic transport models. However, these models did not characterize the likelihood of virus survival under various time and temperature processes that feed ingredients undergo before they are added to swine diets. Here, we developed a quantitative risk assessment model to estimate the probability that one or more corn or soybean meal ocean vessels (25,000 tonnes) contaminated with ASFV would be imported into the United States annually. This final probability estimate was conditionally based on five likelihoods: the probability of initial ASFV contamination (p0), ASFV inactivation during processing (p1) and transport (p2), recontamination (pR), and ASFV inactivation while awaiting customs clearance at United States entry (p3). The probability of ASFV inactivation was modelled using corn and soybean (extruded or solvent extracted) processing conditions (times and temperatures), D-values (time to reduce 90% or 1-log) estimated from studies of ASFV thermal inactivation in pork serum (p1), and survival in feed ingredients during transoceanic transport (p2 and p3). ‘What-if’ scenarios using deterministic values for p0 and pR (1%, 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100%) were used to explore their impact on risk. The model estimated complete inactivation of ASFV after extrusion or solvent extraction processes regardless of the initial ASFV contamination probability assumed. The value of recontamination (ranging from 1% to 75%) was highly influential on the risk of one ASFV-contaminated soybean meal vessel entering the United States. Median risk estimates ranged from 0.064% [0.006%–0.60%; 95% probability interval (PI)], assuming a pR of 1.0%, up to 4.67% (0.45%–36.50% 95% PI) assuming a pR of 75.0%. This means that at least one vessel with ASFV-contaminated soybean meal would be imported once every 1563–21 years, respectively. When all raw corn was assumed to be contaminated (p0 = 100%), and no recontamination was assumed to occur (pR = 0%), the median probability of one vessel with ASFV-contaminated corn entering the United States was 2.02% (0.28%–9.43% 95% PI) or once every 50 years. Values of recontamination between 1% and 75% did not substantially change the risk of corn. Days of transport, virus survival during transport (D-value), and number of vessels shipped were the parameters most influential for increased likelihood of a vessel with ASFV-contaminated soybean meal or corn entering the United States. The model helped to identify knowledge gaps that are most influential on output values and serves as a framework that could be updated and parameterized as new scientific information becomes available. We propose that the quantitative risk assessment model developed in this study can be used as a framework for estimating the risk of ASFV entry into the United States and other ASFV-free countries through other types of imported feed ingredients that may potentially become contaminated. Ultimately, this model can be used to develop risk mitigation strategies and critical control points for inactivating ASFV during feed ingredient processing, storage, and transport, and contribute to the design and implementation of biosecurity measures to prevent the introduction of ASFV into the United States and other ASFV-free countries.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)157-175
Number of pages19
JournalTransboundary and Emerging Diseases
Volume69
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This project has been funded by the Swine Health Information Center. We gratefully acknowledge Mr. Dan Keefe (Senior Trade Consultant, Keefe Consulting, Inc., Rancho Cordova, CA) and Mr. Justin Cauley (Director of Transportation, Global Grain and Processing, CHS, Inc., Inver Grove Heights, MN) for their valuable insights and technical assistance in obtaining details on transportation logistics of imported corn and soybean meal.

Funding Information:
This project has been funded by the Swine Health Information Center. We gratefully acknowledge Mr. Dan Keefe (Senior Trade Consultant, Keefe Consulting, Inc., Rancho Cordova, CA) and Mr. Justin Cauley (Director of Transportation, Global Grain and Processing, CHS, Inc., Inver Grove Heights, MN) for their valuable insights and technical assistance in obtaining details on transportation logistics of imported corn and soybean meal.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Wiley-VCH GmbH

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Rethinking the uncertainty of African swine fever virus contamination in feed ingredients and risk of introduction into the United States'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this