TY - JOUR
T1 - Retraction notice to “Fe3+ partitioning between clinopyroxene and silicate melt at 1–2.5 GPa
T2 - Implications for Fe3+ content of MORB and OIB source mantle” [Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 328 (2022) 258–279, (S0016703722002046), (10.1016/j.gca.2022.04.023)]
AU - Rudra, Avishek
AU - Hirschmann, Marc M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2023/12/1
Y1 - 2023/12/1
N2 - This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies/article-withdrawal). This article has been retracted at the request of the Authors as there are concerns about the reliability and validity of the results included in the article. The journal was contacted by the authors to request the retraction because two key components of the results cannot be reproduced. The measurements of Fe3+/FeT in pyroxenes, which form the main results in the paper, are based on a calibration of XANES analyses which was subsequently determined to not be reproducible. This calibration was previously described in Rudra et al. (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2021.120532, which has now been retracted. Second, the temperatures and pressures of the experiments reported in Table 2 disagree with laboratory records and accurate values cannot be reconstructed with certainty. The editor evaluated this request and approved retraction of the article. The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused.
AB - This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies/article-withdrawal). This article has been retracted at the request of the Authors as there are concerns about the reliability and validity of the results included in the article. The journal was contacted by the authors to request the retraction because two key components of the results cannot be reproduced. The measurements of Fe3+/FeT in pyroxenes, which form the main results in the paper, are based on a calibration of XANES analyses which was subsequently determined to not be reproducible. This calibration was previously described in Rudra et al. (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2021.120532, which has now been retracted. Second, the temperatures and pressures of the experiments reported in Table 2 disagree with laboratory records and accurate values cannot be reconstructed with certainty. The editor evaluated this request and approved retraction of the article. The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85175428743&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85175428743&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.gca.2023.10.011
DO - 10.1016/j.gca.2023.10.011
M3 - Comment/debate
AN - SCOPUS:85175428743
SN - 0016-7037
VL - 362
SP - 129
JO - Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
JF - Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
ER -