Review of State Policies and Guidance for the Identification of Culturally and Linguistically Minoritized Students With Specific Learning Disabilities

Bryn Harris, Tara Kulkarni, Amanda L. Sullivan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The identification of specific learning disabilities (SLD) remains fraught with controversy and uncertainty about professionals’ capacity to appropriately identify special education eligibility. For students from linguistically minoritized backgrounds, the exclusionary clause prohibits the identification of learning difficulties primarily attributable to contextual or linguistic factors. Yet the ambiguity of the federal language may hinder application, making critical states’ interpretation and corresponding guidance for professional practice in eligibility determination. In this archival study, we systematically reviewed state departments’ education policies and related guidance on the identification of multilingual learners with SLD, with a focus on how states have articulated policies and procedures related to the federal exclusionary clause. Our findings demonstrate variability and depth of information across states pertaining to guidance regarding the exclusionary clause. Implications for practice and policy are provided.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3-15
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Learning Disabilities
Volume57
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Hammill Institute on Disabilities 2023.

Keywords

  • bilingual
  • culture
  • exclusionary clause
  • multilingual learner
  • special education law
  • specific learning disability

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Systematic Review
  • Journal Article

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Review of State Policies and Guidance for the Identification of Culturally and Linguistically Minoritized Students With Specific Learning Disabilities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this