Role of oxide support in electrocatalytic nitrate reduction on Cu

O. Quinn Carvalho, Sophia R.S. Jones, Ashley E. Berninghaus, Richard F. Hilliard, Tyler S. Radniecki, Kelsey A. Stoerzinger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The electrochemical nitrate reduction reaction (NO3RR) has the potential for distributed water treatment and renewable chemical synthesis. Cu is an active monometallic electrocatalyst for the NO3RR in acidic and alkaline electrolytes, where activity is limited by the reduction of adsorbed nitrate to nitrite. Oxygen-vacancy forming metal-oxide supports provide sites for N-O bond activation in thermal reduction, impacting product distribution as well. Here we compare the electrochemical NO3RR activity of Cu deposited on two metal-oxide supports (cerium dioxide [Cu/CeO2-δ] and fluorine-doped tin dioxide [Cu/FTO]) to a Cu foil benchmark. Considering activity in phosphate-buffered neutral media, nitrate and adsorbed hydrogen compete for surface sites under NO3RR conditions. The less-cathodic overpotential on Cu/CeO2-δ compared to Cu/FTO is attributed to stronger nitrate adsorption, similar to thermal nitrate reduction. Utilization of CeO2-δ as an electrocatalyst support slightly shifting product distribution toward more oxidized products, either by enhancing nitrate affinity or by a more dynamic process involving the formation and healing of oxygen vacancies (Formula presented.). These results suggest supporting catalysts on metal oxides may enhance activity by promoting the adsorption of anionic reactants on cathodic electrocatalysts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere2100201
JournalElectrochemical Science Advances
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2024
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. Electrochemical Science Advances published by Wiley-VCH GmbH.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Role of oxide support in electrocatalytic nitrate reduction on Cu'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this