TY - JOUR
T1 - Sewage sludge co-pyrolysis with agricultural/forest residues
T2 - A comparative life-cycle assessment
AU - Mohamed, Badr A.
AU - Ruan, Roger
AU - Bilal, Muhammad
AU - Periyasamy, Selvakumar
AU - Awasthi, Mukesh Kumar
AU - Rajamohan, Natarajan
AU - Leng, Lijian
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023
PY - 2024/3
Y1 - 2024/3
N2 - This study aims to determine the sustainability and energy efficiency of co-pyrolysis scenarios as treatment processes for municipal sewage sludge through a life cycle assessment (LCA). In addition, sensitivity and energy recovery analyses are conducted to determine the possible methods for optimizing the co-pyrolysis process from a circular bioeconomy perspective. Corncob and wood residue have been selected as potential co-feed materials for co-pyrolysis with sewage sludge at three mixing ratios (25, 50, and 75 wt%). The functional unit (FU) for this study is 1000 kg of dried single or mixed feedstock. LCA results indicate that sewage sludge, in a singular pyrolysis scenario, demonstrated the most unfavorable outcome by causing a rise in all negative environmental indicators. In contrast, the overall environmental impacts are reduced by up to 48 %, when the sewage sludge is mixed with co-feed biomass (wood or corncobs), with corncob co-pyrolysis performing better than wood residue in most impact indicators. Energy recovery from a gas turbine provides significant benefits, generating about nine times of the required energy for gas turbine operation and supplying sufficient energy to sustain the whole process. This is notably evident for corncob co-pyrolysis, where the energy produced from gas recovery is equivalent to 59–181 % of energy requirement of the whole process and achieved the highest net positive energy balance (+1368 kWh/FU). Sensitivity analysis indicates that co-pyrolysis is more sensitive to bio-oil yield fluctuations and feedstock transportation. In conclusion, this study establishes that sewage sludge co-pyrolysis is a more environmentally friendly treatment approach when compared to single pyrolysis.
AB - This study aims to determine the sustainability and energy efficiency of co-pyrolysis scenarios as treatment processes for municipal sewage sludge through a life cycle assessment (LCA). In addition, sensitivity and energy recovery analyses are conducted to determine the possible methods for optimizing the co-pyrolysis process from a circular bioeconomy perspective. Corncob and wood residue have been selected as potential co-feed materials for co-pyrolysis with sewage sludge at three mixing ratios (25, 50, and 75 wt%). The functional unit (FU) for this study is 1000 kg of dried single or mixed feedstock. LCA results indicate that sewage sludge, in a singular pyrolysis scenario, demonstrated the most unfavorable outcome by causing a rise in all negative environmental indicators. In contrast, the overall environmental impacts are reduced by up to 48 %, when the sewage sludge is mixed with co-feed biomass (wood or corncobs), with corncob co-pyrolysis performing better than wood residue in most impact indicators. Energy recovery from a gas turbine provides significant benefits, generating about nine times of the required energy for gas turbine operation and supplying sufficient energy to sustain the whole process. This is notably evident for corncob co-pyrolysis, where the energy produced from gas recovery is equivalent to 59–181 % of energy requirement of the whole process and achieved the highest net positive energy balance (+1368 kWh/FU). Sensitivity analysis indicates that co-pyrolysis is more sensitive to bio-oil yield fluctuations and feedstock transportation. In conclusion, this study establishes that sewage sludge co-pyrolysis is a more environmentally friendly treatment approach when compared to single pyrolysis.
KW - Bio-oil
KW - Co-pyrolysis
KW - Gas turbine
KW - Global warming
KW - Life cycle assessment
KW - Sewage sludge
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85181171665&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85181171665&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.rser.2023.114168
DO - 10.1016/j.rser.2023.114168
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85181171665
SN - 1364-0321
VL - 192
JO - Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
JF - Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
M1 - 114168
ER -