Should businesses take a stand? Effects of perceived psychological distance on consumers’ expectation and evaluation of corporate social advocacy

Hao Xu, Eugene Lee, Hyejoon Rim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

Nowadays companies are increasingly engaging in social-political issues. In light of the Construal Level Theory, this study examined the polarizing/depolarizing effects of perceived psychological distance on consumers’ expectation of corporate social advocacy and evaluations among consumers from different partisan identities. A between-subjects experiment (N = 296) with a continuous independent variable–perceived psychological distance–was employed. The study found that consumers with a closer perceived psychological distance to the company tended to have a higher expectation of corporate social advocacy. However, perceptions of psychological distance resulted in mixed effects regarding people’s attitudes and buycott/boycott intentions, where consumer-company identification mediated these relationships. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)840-863
Number of pages24
JournalJournal of Marketing Communications
Volume28
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Keywords

  • Corporate social advocacy
  • boycott
  • buycott
  • construal level theory
  • consumer-company identification
  • partisan identity
  • psychological distance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Should businesses take a stand? Effects of perceived psychological distance on consumers’ expectation and evaluation of corporate social advocacy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this