Standing on shaky ground? Dyadic and longitudinal associations between posttraumatic stress and relationship quality postearthquake

Emma M. Marshall, Roeline G. Kuijer, Jeffry A. Simpson, Ohad Szepsenwol

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Scopus citations

Abstract

In the current study, we took a unique dyadic approach to examine how people's relationship quality following an earthquake was associated with their and their partner's posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) and whether support exchanges in the relationship protected relationship quality in the face of this adversity. Ninety-nine heterosexual couples were studied over 4 time points for approximately 15 months following the Canterbury, New Zealand, earthquakes. The data were analyzed using moderated growthcurve modeling in an Actor-Partner Interdependence Model framework. In line with predictions, both partners' PTSS scores were associated with lower relationship quality at Time 1 (the first assessment postearthquake). These associations, however, were attenuated by more frequent provisions of support between relationship partners, especially for men, at least in the short term. The associations, however, changed across time, suggesting that coping in a relationship context post trauma is a dynamic, fluid process. These findings demonstrate the importance of adopting a dyadic perspective and examining effects across time. They also highlight the importance of examining resources within the relationship context to more fully understand how PTSS affects relationships.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)721-733
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Family Psychology
Volume31
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2017

Keywords

  • Interdependence
  • Marriage
  • Posttraumatic stress disorder/symptoms
  • Relationship quality
  • Social support

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Standing on shaky ground? Dyadic and longitudinal associations between posttraumatic stress and relationship quality postearthquake'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this