Stratigraphic revision of the early Miocene Kiahera Formation from Rusinga Island, Lake Victoria, Kenya

Lauren A. Michel, Daniel J. Peppe, Kimberly D. Cheng, Hunter Summers, H. Wayne Leimer, Thomas Lehmann, Samuel Muteti, Kieran P. McNulty

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Decades of research in Early Miocene deposits on Rusinga Island, Lake Victoria, Kenya, have made its fossil record pivotal for interpreting floral and faunal evolution in eastern Africa during the early Neogene. Paleontological research has largely focused on Rusinga Island's fossil-rich Hiwegi Formation, and because that work has largely motivated geological research a similar bias can also be found in stratigraphic studies of the island's deposits. Hence, the resolution of paleoclimate, paleohabitat, and floral and faunal community reconstructions from other formations is limited, and discrepancies in stratigraphic placement and correlations among outcrops limit our ability to fully assess the interplay of climate and evolution. New lithostratigraphic and sedimentologic analyses of the Kiahera Formation on Rusinga Island clarify these discrepancies. Our work demonstrates that the Kiahera Formation comprises ten facies and can be divided into three discrete clastic units (from bottom to top): Nyamita Spring Member, Ukowe Member, and Rondo Member. The lithofacies in the formation are composed of conglomerates, sandstones, airfall tuffaceous units, and paleosols. Conglomerates, sandstones, and paleosols are found primarily within fluvially-dominated sediments in the Nyamita Spring and Rondo Members, interpreted to represent little to no volcanic input. Tuffaceous units occur within the middle Ukowe Member and record a series of eruptions of the neighboring Kisingiri Volcano. Importantly, reassessment of the type section of the Wayando Formation, which previous researchers identified as the oldest formation on Rusinga Island, demonstrates that it is stratigraphically and lithologically equivalent with the upper member of the Kiahera Formation. Other deposits historically attributed to the Wayando Formation can likewise be correlated with sections of the Kiahera Formation. Hence, the Kiahera Formation represents the oldest sediments on Rusinga. Finally, our revised descriptions and analysis enabled us to identify the basal member of the Kiahera Formation in outcrops on neighboring Mfangano Island, but stratigraphically well above where previous researchers had positioned them. This provides a new basis for interpreting the relationship between Mfangano Island's important fossil assemblages and the better-known assemblages from Rusinga Island. In total, clarification and consolidation of Rusinga Island's Kiahera Formation significantly impact paleontological and paleoecological characterizations of this unit and of the entire Early Miocene geological sequence on the island, further informing interpretations of how Rusinga's fossil sites formed with respect to the evolving Kisingiri Volcano.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number104877
JournalJournal of African Earth Sciences
Volume200
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2023

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Data that supports the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Fieldwork at Rusinga Island was conducted under research permits granted on the authority of the National Commission for Science, Technology and Innovation (e.g., NACOSTI/P/18/73655/17421 , NACOSTI/P/18/9092/23264 ), and Exploration/Excavation Licenses (e.g. NMK/GVT/2) were granted by the Ministry of Sports and Heritage. We greatly appreciate the support of the National Museums of Kenya, especially Dr. F. Manthi, and acknowledge funding from the Leakey Foundation , Tennessee Tech University Department of Earth Sciences , Tennessee Tech URECA and CISE programs, and the Karl und Marie Schack-Siftung . We are indebted to Dickens Aketch, Joseph Kiseu, Cliff Ochieng, Samuel Owuor Odhiambo, Collince Ouma, Jackson Shaduma, and Joshua Siembo for assistance in the field. The authors wish to thank Neil Tabor for invaluable conversations about facies and architectural elements. The editors and reviewers are gratefully acknowledge for their comments which improved the study. This manuscript is publication #24 supporting Research on Eastern African Catarrhine and Hominoid Evolution (REACHE).

Funding Information:
Our lithostratigraphic analysis identified ten lithofacies (Table 2) within the Kiahera Formation. In approximate order of stratigraphic occurrence, the lithofacies observed in the Kiahera Formation are (1) Clast-Supported Polymictic Conglomerate (CPC), (2) Matrix-Supported Polymictic Conglomerate (MPC), (3) Paleosol 1 (P1), (4) Coarse Sandstone (CS), (5) Bedded Tuff (BT), (6) Massive Tuff (MT), (7) Volcaniclastic Sediment with Volcanic Breccia (VSVB), (8) Paleosol 2 (P2), (9) Paleosol 3 (P3), and (10) Polymictic Quartz Pebble Conglomerate (PQPC). These different lithofacies are strongly controlled by proximity to and activity of the neighboring Kisingiri Volcano.Two distinct conglomeratic lithofacies are found throughout the basal-most Kiahera Formation sequence: the CPC and the MPC. The CPC and MPC are remarkably similar with the primary distinction being whether the unit is clast- (CPC) or matrix- (MPC) supported. Both conglomerates are dominated by fining-upwards successions and include abundant granodiorite and nephelenite clasts. The granodiorite likely reflects input from the Precambrian basement (Table 2, Fig. 3A, C and E). In some cases, ash and accretionary lapilli clasts are found within both lithofacies. Grains vary from <1 cm to 20 cm in diameter and have rounded to sub-rounded grains. In both lithofacies, <0.5 cm diameter amphibole crystals are commonly found within the matrix and <0.5 cm diameter garnets also rarely occur. The CPC and MPC facies are associated with the CS and P1 facies.Data that supports the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Fieldwork at Rusinga Island was conducted under research permits granted on the authority of the National Commission for Science, Technology and Innovation (e.g. NACOSTI/P/18/73655/17421, NACOSTI/P/18/9092/23264), and Exploration/Excavation Licenses (e.g. NMK/GVT/2) were granted by the Ministry of Sports and Heritage. We greatly appreciate the support of the National Museums of Kenya, especially Dr. F. Manthi, and acknowledge funding from the Leakey Foundation, Tennessee Tech University Department of Earth Sciences, Tennessee Tech URECA and CISE programs, and the Karl und Marie Schack-Siftung. We are indebted to Dickens Aketch, Joseph Kiseu, Cliff Ochieng, Samuel Owuor Odhiambo, Collince Ouma, Jackson Shaduma, and Joshua Siembo for assistance in the field. The authors wish to thank Neil Tabor for invaluable conversations about facies and architectural elements. The editors and reviewers are gratefully acknowledge for their comments which improved the study. This manuscript is publication #24 supporting Research on Eastern African Catarrhine and Hominoid Evolution (REACHE).

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier Ltd

Keywords

  • Ekembo
  • Kiahera Formation
  • Rusinga Island
  • Stratigraphy
  • Wayando Formation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Stratigraphic revision of the early Miocene Kiahera Formation from Rusinga Island, Lake Victoria, Kenya'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this