Testing Retouched Flake Tool Standardization During the Middle Paleolithic: Patterns and Implications

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

28 Scopus citations

Abstract

It has long been claimed that retouched flake tools become more standardized throughout the Lower and Middle Paleolithic. Since stone tool standardization has been linked to cognitive abilities, specifically, to the presence of mental templates, the implications of an increase in standardization throughout this time period are that hominid cognitive abilities, including language, became more developed. Such an increase in standardization during this span of time has never been verified empirically, however. In addition, there is reason to question the link between lithic artifact standardization and hominid cognitive abilities. The purpose of this paper is therefore two-fold: first, to empirically test the notion that stone tools become more standardized throughout the late Middle and early Upper Pleistocene, and second, to explore potential causes of standardization more parsimonious than the deliberate imposition of arbitrary form. The results for the first part show no significant increases in standardization among retouched stone tools at three French sites spanning the late Middle and early Upper Pleistocene. The second part yields an interesting new hypothesis regarding circumstances which may lead to standardization among retouched tools, and helps explain why standardization seems to be so much more common after the start of the Upper Paleolithic.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationInterdisciplinary Contributions to Archaeology
PublisherSpringer Nature
Pages57-83
Number of pages27
DOIs
StatePublished - 2006

Publication series

NameInterdisciplinary Contributions to Archaeology
ISSN (Print)1568-2722

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The author wishes to thank Jean-Jacques Cleyet-Merle, Jean Combier, Andr? Deb?nath, Henry de Lumley, Denise de Sonneville-Bordes, Jean-Fran?ois Tournepiche, and Paola Villa for providing access and permission to study the collections; and Harold Dibble, Erella Hovers, Steve Kuhn, and Gilbert Tostevin for providing useful comments on earlier versions of this paper. Funding for the data collection was provided by a Traveling Fellowship from the French Institute for Culture and Technology at the University of Pennsylvania.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2006, Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

Keywords

  • Projectile Point
  • Stone Tool
  • Test Implication
  • Tool Type
  • World Archaeology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Testing Retouched Flake Tool Standardization During the Middle Paleolithic: Patterns and Implications'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this