The impact of water on slip system activity in olivine and the formation of bimodal crystallographic preferred orientations

D. Wallis, L. N. Hansen, M. Tasaka, K. M. Kumamoto, A. J. Parsons, G. E. Lloyd, D. L. Kohlstedt, A. J. Wilkinson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Scopus citations

Abstract

Crystallographic preferred orientations (CPOs) in olivine are widely used to infer the mechanisms, conditions, and kinematics of deformation of mantle rocks. Recent experiments on water-saturated olivine were the first to produce a complex CPO characterised by bimodal orientation distributions of both [100] and [001] axes and inferred to form by combined activity of (001)[100], (100)[001], and (010)[100] slip. This result potentially provides a new microstructural indicator of deformation in the presence of elevated concentrations of intracrystalline hydrous point defects and has implications for the interpretation of seismic anisotropy. Here, we document a previously unexplained natural example of this CPO type in a xenolith from Lesotho and demonstrate that it too may be explained by elevated concentrations of hydrous point defects. We test and confirm the hypothesis that combined (001)[100], (100)[001], and (010)[100] slip were responsible for formation of this CPO by (1) using high-angular resolution electron backscatter diffraction to precisely characterise the dislocation types present in both the experimental and natural samples and (2) employing visco-plastic self-consistent simulations of CPO evolution to assess the ability of these slip systems to generate the observed CPO. Finally, we utilise calculations based on effective-medium theory to predict the anisotropy of seismic wave velocities arising from the CPO of the xenolith. Maxima in S-wave velocities and anisotropy are parallel to both the shear direction and shear plane normal, whereas maxima in P-wave velocities are oblique to both, adding complexity to interpretation of deformation kinematics from seismic anisotropy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)51-61
Number of pages11
JournalEarth and Planetary Science Letters
Volume508
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 15 2019

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
We thank Graham Pearson and Peter Nixon for providing a sample of xenolith PHN1611 and David Mainprice for discussions its microstructure. D. Wallis, L.N. Hansen, and A.J. Wilkinson acknowledge support from the Natural Environment Research Council Grant NE/M000966/1. M. Tasaka acknowledges support through a JSPS Research Fellowship for Young Scientists (26-4879) and the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (16K17832). D.L. Kohlstedt acknowledges support through NASA Grant NNX15AL53G. K.M. Kumamoto acknowledges support through NSF Division of Earth Science grants 1255620 and 1625032. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of NSF.

Funding Information:
We thank Graham Pearson and Peter Nixon for providing a sample of xenolith PHN1611 and David Mainprice for discussions its microstructure. D. Wallis, L.N. Hansen, and A.J. Wilkinson acknowledge support from the Natural Environment Research Council Grant NE/M000966/1 . M. Tasaka acknowledges support through a JSPS Research Fellowship for Young Scientists ( 26-4879 ) and the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science ( 16K17832 ). D.L. Kohlstedt acknowledges support through NASA Grant NNX15AL53G . K.M. Kumamoto acknowledges support through NSF Division of Earth Science grants 1255620 and 1625032 . Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of NSF.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Authors

Keywords

  • HR-EBSD
  • VPSC
  • crystallographic preferred orientation
  • dislocation slip system
  • olivine
  • seismic properties

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The impact of water on slip system activity in olivine and the formation of bimodal crystallographic preferred orientations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this