They’re Coming for You! How Perceptions of Automation Affect Public Support for Universal Basic Income

Kathryn Haglin, Soren Jordan, Grant Ferguson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Media stories on the economy tout automation as one of the biggest contemporary technological changes in America and argue that many Americans may lose their jobs because of it. Politicians and financial elites often promote a policy of Universal Basic Income (UBI) as a solution to the potential unemployment caused by automation, suggesting Americans should support UBI to protect them from this technological disruption. This linkage and basic descriptive findings are largely untested: we don’t know much about whether Americans support UBI, see automation as a threat to their job, or connect the two in any meaningful way. Using a Mechanical Turk survey of 3600 respondents, we examine the relationship between Americans’ perception of how much automation threatens their jobs, how much automation actually threatens their jobs, and their support for UBI. Our results indicate that while the public does not view automation as the same threat that elites do, Americans who believe their jobs will be automated are more likely to support UBI. These relationships, however, vary considerably by political party.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalSocial Science Computer Review
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2023.

Keywords

  • automation
  • partisanship
  • public opinion
  • universal basic income

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'They’re Coming for You! How Perceptions of Automation Affect Public Support for Universal Basic Income'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this