TY - JOUR
T1 - Threats to Freshwater Fisheries in the United States
T2 - Perspectives and Investments of State Fisheries Administrators and Agricultural Experiment Station Directors
AU - Carlson, Andrew K.
AU - Taylor, William W.
AU - Kinnison, Michael T.
AU - Sullivan, S. Mažeika P.
AU - Weber, Michael J.
AU - Melstrom, Richard T.
AU - Venturelli, Paul A.
AU - Wuellner, Melissa R.
AU - Newman, Raymond M.
AU - Hartman, Kyle J.
AU - Zydlewski, Gayle B.
AU - DeVries, Dennis R.
AU - Gray, Suzanne M.
AU - Infante, Dana M.
AU - Pegg, Mark A.
AU - Harrell, Reggie M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American Fisheries Society
PY - 2019/6
Y1 - 2019/6
N2 - Freshwater fisheries provide human benefits (e.g., food, recreation) but are increasingly threatened by climate change, invasive species, and other stressors. Our purpose was to survey fisheries administrators from state fisheries agencies and Agricultural Experiment Stations (AESs) about their perceptions of, and resource investment toward, threats to freshwater fisheries in the United States. Our rationale for studying these two types of fisheries administrators simultaneously was to inform state fisheries professionals about the fisheries relevance of AESs, elevate the profile of fisheries within AESs, and promote mutually beneficial state agency–AES partnerships. Survey respondents generally agreed that recreational, socioeconomic, and ecological services of fisheries were more important than nutritional and commercial benefits. The greatest perceived fisheries threats were water quality/quantity impairment, land-use change, and invasive species—but, interestingly, not climate change. State fisheries agencies invested more personnel and finances into issues rated as less important but more controllable (e.g., fish production, habitat management) than issues rated as more important but larger in scale and more difficult to control (e.g., water quality/quantity, invasive species). Our research underscores the importance of ensuring that state agencies can address long-term, socio-ecologically critical management issues (e.g., climate change) amid budgetary constraints. We call for state agencies to collaborate with new partners (e.g., AESs) to mitigate fisheries threats by expanding fisheries management to more fully encompass terrestrial and human systems; promoting receptiveness to novel research/management ideas; actively predicting, monitoring, and planning for future stressors; and enhancing fisheries’ social–ecological resilience.
AB - Freshwater fisheries provide human benefits (e.g., food, recreation) but are increasingly threatened by climate change, invasive species, and other stressors. Our purpose was to survey fisheries administrators from state fisheries agencies and Agricultural Experiment Stations (AESs) about their perceptions of, and resource investment toward, threats to freshwater fisheries in the United States. Our rationale for studying these two types of fisheries administrators simultaneously was to inform state fisheries professionals about the fisheries relevance of AESs, elevate the profile of fisheries within AESs, and promote mutually beneficial state agency–AES partnerships. Survey respondents generally agreed that recreational, socioeconomic, and ecological services of fisheries were more important than nutritional and commercial benefits. The greatest perceived fisheries threats were water quality/quantity impairment, land-use change, and invasive species—but, interestingly, not climate change. State fisheries agencies invested more personnel and finances into issues rated as less important but more controllable (e.g., fish production, habitat management) than issues rated as more important but larger in scale and more difficult to control (e.g., water quality/quantity, invasive species). Our research underscores the importance of ensuring that state agencies can address long-term, socio-ecologically critical management issues (e.g., climate change) amid budgetary constraints. We call for state agencies to collaborate with new partners (e.g., AESs) to mitigate fisheries threats by expanding fisheries management to more fully encompass terrestrial and human systems; promoting receptiveness to novel research/management ideas; actively predicting, monitoring, and planning for future stressors; and enhancing fisheries’ social–ecological resilience.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065156211&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065156211&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/fsh.10238
DO - 10.1002/fsh.10238
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85065156211
SN - 0363-2415
VL - 44
SP - 276
EP - 287
JO - Fisheries
JF - Fisheries
IS - 6
ER -