Three-dimensional cone-beam computed technology evaluation of skeletal and dental changes in growing patients with Class II malocclusion treated with the cervical pull face-bow headgear appliance

William Ray Bates, Lucia Soares Cevidanes, Brent E. Larson, David Adams, Antonio Carlos De Oliveira Ruellas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to 3-dimensionally quantify and compare the outcomes of growing patients with Class II malocclusion treated with the cervical pull face-bow headgear appliance in combination with full fixed orthodontic appliances. Methods: The study sample consisted of 22 patients with Class II malocclusion with the following inclusion criteria: ANB >4.75°, Class II molar relationship, and SN-GoGn <37°. The mean age of patients was 12.5 ± 1.1 years at baseline. The average treatment time was 27.7 ± 7.3 months. Cone-beam computed tomography scans were superimposed in the cranial base, maxillary regional, and mandibular regional to evaluate growth, treatment displacements, and bone remodeling. Results: Relevant statistically and clinically significant skeletal changes included average decreases in ANB (2.1 ± 1.1°) and SNA (1.8 ± 1.1°); posterior (1.3 ± 1.4 mm) and inferior (4.6 ± 2.2 mm) displacement of A-point; inferior displacements of B-point (5.4 ± 2.8 mm) and Pogonion (5.8 ± 2.6 mm); superior displacement of Condylion (6.9 ± 2.4 mm); increase in mandibular length (5.4 ± 2.0 mm); and clockwise rotation of palatal plane (1.9 ± 1.9°). Significant proclination of the maxillary incisors (9.8 ± 11.1°) and nonsignificant proclination of the mandibular incisors (4.7 ± 9.6°) were also noted. Conclusions: Class II skeletal correction was primarily achieved by posterior, inferior displacement of the sagittal position of the maxilla. Change in the sagittal position of the mandible/chin (B-point, Pogonion) was not significant; rather, mandibular displacement was significant in an inferior vertical direction without backward rotation, as seen from marked condylar and ramus growth.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)491-501
Number of pages11
JournalAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Volume162
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 American Association of Orthodontists

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Three-dimensional cone-beam computed technology evaluation of skeletal and dental changes in growing patients with Class II malocclusion treated with the cervical pull face-bow headgear appliance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this