TY - JOUR
T1 - Trade-Offs Faced by 2-and 4-Year College Students Experiencing Food Insecurity
T2 - An Analysis of Qualitative Data
AU - McGuire, Cydney M.
AU - Stebleton, Michael J.
AU - Lenk, Kathleen M.
AU - Lust, Katherine
AU - Porta, Carolyn M.
AU - Laska, Melissa N.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2023.
PY - 2023/11
Y1 - 2023/11
N2 - Purpose: To understand the trade-offs, defined as compromises or decisions students must make to prioritize one important need over another, as a result of economic constraints, food insecure (FI) college students experience and the perceived impact of these challenges on health, well-being, and academic achievement. Design: 8 Semi-structured focus groups. Setting: Seven 2- and 4-year Minnesota colleges. Participants: 53 students initially screening positive for FI. Method: The focus groups were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis, a systematic approach for identifying and analyzing patterns across qualitative data, was used through four analysis phases to identify themes and categories. Results: We identified five themes within trade-offs: sacrificing food, missing out on relationships, sacrificing academic studies, choosing between basic needs, and maintaining physical and mental well-being. The trade-offs students described were multifaceted, caused notable stress and worry, and presented challenges to students’ well-being. Conclusion: This study provides evidence on the complexities of FI among students and details on what students may be sacrificing as a result of making trade-offs. Understanding the trade-offs students are experiencing can help college staff to prioritize which issues to focus on to improve student health and academic performance.
AB - Purpose: To understand the trade-offs, defined as compromises or decisions students must make to prioritize one important need over another, as a result of economic constraints, food insecure (FI) college students experience and the perceived impact of these challenges on health, well-being, and academic achievement. Design: 8 Semi-structured focus groups. Setting: Seven 2- and 4-year Minnesota colleges. Participants: 53 students initially screening positive for FI. Method: The focus groups were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis, a systematic approach for identifying and analyzing patterns across qualitative data, was used through four analysis phases to identify themes and categories. Results: We identified five themes within trade-offs: sacrificing food, missing out on relationships, sacrificing academic studies, choosing between basic needs, and maintaining physical and mental well-being. The trade-offs students described were multifaceted, caused notable stress and worry, and presented challenges to students’ well-being. Conclusion: This study provides evidence on the complexities of FI among students and details on what students may be sacrificing as a result of making trade-offs. Understanding the trade-offs students are experiencing can help college staff to prioritize which issues to focus on to improve student health and academic performance.
KW - basic needs
KW - food security
KW - post-secondary education
KW - qualitative
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85169806443&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85169806443&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/08901171231184074
DO - 10.1177/08901171231184074
M3 - Article
C2 - 37606579
AN - SCOPUS:85169806443
SN - 0890-1171
VL - 37
SP - 1133
EP - 1140
JO - American Journal of Health Promotion
JF - American Journal of Health Promotion
IS - 8
ER -